Replies

  • OUT

    • IN ....that's just to cancel your vote.

      PS Let's say you get 100 outs or 100 ins....what difference does it make in your mind....its not as if it matters.

      That makes it all square.....you can delete the blog now LOL

       

  • Out - yesterday

  • Out, but he''ll stay until retirement. Thats how safe his job is

  • OUT
    For 3 key reasons.

    1. He's failed to improve our Club's junior development in this are, which has been especially poor at producing genuine first graders.
    2. He's failed to close the deal on a number of promising deals impacting our ability to improve our ladder position
    3. He has no capability or skills in attracting high-quality talent.

    When you look at these 3 key issues, we'll never improve our position without getting a lot of luck from the junior development in our area.

  • What's the point of this,there not even gonna see it.Storming the comment section of the eels page #ONEILOUT.Is prob the best bet.Dragons fans did it and look what happend. 🤷‍♂️ 

  • Shane Richardson in would be the best.He can attract big name players and turn this shithole around

    • So far its

      OUT. x 5

      Keep x. 1

    • Richo would take Jim's role, not O'Niell's

       

  • Out. We are wasting our breath and money supporting this club, nothing will change. That's the response I got from a certain person high up at the club.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Clintorian replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Mark O’Neill Keep or Out - The ultimate Vote
"Richo would take Jim's role, not O'Niell's
 "
16 seconds ago
MeelK replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Mark O’Neill Keep or Out - The ultimate Vote
"Maybe out, but could be in."
1 minute ago
Jman replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Mark O’Neill Keep or Out - The ultimate Vote
"Out can't get the job done "
1 minute ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Mark O’Neill Keep or Out - The ultimate Vote
""
2 minutes ago
More…