Replies

    • Chiefy and Jimmy Wong?....... Probably a training partnership......on second thoughts make that "toilet training"

  • Who replaces him?

  • Thank that mythical character God.

    Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

    Now, will the club look for a top notch replacement or go with their usual ethos of anyone cheap will do.

  • Why is Marl O'Neil still running Parra when he has clearly shown intrest in taking the Tigers job he could be undermining our junior ranks as we speak the board should get rid of him straight up 

    • First of all have we got confirmation that he's leaving ?

      Secondly, it is accepted practice for executives to announce they are leaving well before their scheduled departure days. The importance of their role demands more than a weeks notice wherever possible. He has many responsibilities that need to be handed over, a smooth transition is required. 

      Finally, to suggest he would intentionally sabotage us on the way out shows his little you truly understand Chief. To do so would be career suicide. No club would go near him if it became known that he'd be the kind to pull that kind of stunt. Clubs may be in competition with each other, but they also talk to each other. 

      Only a person of limited integrity would assume that of someone else. 

      • This reply was deleted.
        • Not until he was employed by the Tigers. He didn't recruit for the Tigers whilst he was working for Manly. 

          • Jimmy was just showing his limited integrity Brett

    • He likes his fingers in more than 1 pie 

      • Well maybe CE could match Chiefy in integrity?

    • Marl and Intrest....yep Chiefy is the brains behind the Trio!

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Parramatta Tragic replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"You seem very well informed on Wiz and Fong, Randy. How is that? Are you a burner account for someone "in the know?"
If indeed they both have been banned again, can you please definately confirm that here as it will confirm that this place has…"
16 minutes ago
iamnot replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Strangest part about the Lomax situation.
"I'd be interested to know if Schifcofske has been breaking the NRL anti-tampering laws, both old and new. He manages both Lomax and Papenhuizen. 
It had been clear for some time that Papenhuizen was not likely to be playing NRL in 2026. Injuries had…"
32 minutes ago
HKF replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"Brown at 7? Typo."
1 hour ago
EA replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"Good depth if Russel, Guymer and Doorey can't make the 19."
2 hours ago
More…