You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"And Chris Thorman!"
"Coryn, Gus is great. Respect. But facts before bias. The spine matters. It’s still taken him about 5 years to sort his spine. Ours is more settled after only a year or so without sugar daddies and Gus' 50 years of connections.
Ivan Cleary won’t…"
Ivan Cleary won’t…"
"Not in this case the stepping stone is perfect for them not us why would we be paying market value for that.Demand doesn't fall into this conversation because we've basically given them what they want.
We've just lost an international calibre half…"
We've just lost an international calibre half…"
"Looks pretty fit for a 47 yo lol.
Keep us up to date on his arrival "
Keep us up to date on his arrival "
Replies
Sorry est but you need to look at the obstruction rule a bit closer as you are wrong on both points.
The reason they surrender after running behind a team mate is so as to not break the below rule (ie. not disadvantage the defensive line). It is why Moeroa was pulled up after running behind Foran last week.
"Running behind your own player:
The ball carrier must not run behind an active block-runner and disadvantage the defensive line."
And the law is also pretty clear on a sweep player receiving the ball before the inside shoulder.
"The indicators for an obstruction include:
4. Attacking players who run a ‘Sweep’^ line must receive the ball beyond the inside shoulder
of the ‘Block’ or ‘Flat’ runner[s]"
I actually think the bunker/refs have been very consistent on it this year.
http://www.nrl.com/laws-of-the-game-obstruction/tabid/10874/newsid/...
I disagree, the rule is as clear as it can be and as long as the bunker is CONSISTENT I think everyone will soon know what they can and can't do. And from what I have seen so far of the bunker they appear to be more consistent than the old system where it was a lottery on interpretation/application of the obstruction rule.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next