Luke Brooks

They were saying on 360 last night Tigers may want to offload him and pay some freight. Would he go any good at hooker? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I thought Moses played humblest game last week against Chooks. They were compromised by no Keary who I rate highly. Poor bugger plays his heart out.  

    • Mitch was outstanding against the Roosters fool. 

      • Keet has a thing against Moses, in her fantasies she feels she knows all these boys. When she takes a set against you look out....she is a nasty little Budgie!

        • Poppa all I said was Moses is no way a million dollar player.  Nothing nasty in that not many players are.  Adam Reynolds  is on 750 and I bet Chad Townsend, Keary or Hughes not million dollar players either.  Whats nasty about that you have just said Brooks is a 400 player but I can't comment?  Your way or the highway.  

          • geez you are deluded - so you don't rate moses up there with hunt, brooks, ponga? i know who i would rather have, and it aint one of them 3

      • Brett Allen if your talking to me I didn't say he didn't in fact probably his best game for Eels. 

        • He's been outstanding, consistently so I might add, for the last 4 seasons. He's been getting incrementally better every year to the point where I wouldn't swap him for any halfback in the league. 

  • no thanks, what a joke

  • I wouldn't mind him as our 14. Wonder what BA could do to his defence. Secondly, he will be a much better back up than fking JA.

  • This reply was deleted.
    • All true, but I must admit to being intrigued by what he could do in a quality system. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

iamnot replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"that's on Lomax, his agent and his legal team, not Parramatta. If R360 made promises to him they couldn't fulfil, its on Lomax to take R360 to court. "
20 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"If you lost Joliffe would you replace him with Matto?....it's like replacing your car with a banana"
21 minutes ago
iamnot replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"R360 didn't exist at all when Lomax requested, and obtained, the release. It still doesn't. Lomax never had a contract there, as neither did any other player, including RTS. So, Lomax doesn't have an argument that his circumstances have changed. And…"
23 minutes ago
iamnot replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Absolutely Melbourne have been cooking this up for months, no doubt in breach of anti-tampering laws. But the NRL don't want to go digging there again. "
26 minutes ago
More…