Luke Brooks

They were saying on 360 last night Tigers may want to offload him and pay some freight. Would he go any good at hooker? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I thought Moses played humblest game last week against Chooks. They were compromised by no Keary who I rate highly. Poor bugger plays his heart out.  

    • Mitch was outstanding against the Roosters fool. 

      • Keet has a thing against Moses, in her fantasies she feels she knows all these boys. When she takes a set against you look out....she is a nasty little Budgie!

        • Poppa all I said was Moses is no way a million dollar player.  Nothing nasty in that not many players are.  Adam Reynolds  is on 750 and I bet Chad Townsend, Keary or Hughes not million dollar players either.  Whats nasty about that you have just said Brooks is a 400 player but I can't comment?  Your way or the highway.  

          • geez you are deluded - so you don't rate moses up there with hunt, brooks, ponga? i know who i would rather have, and it aint one of them 3

      • Brett Allen if your talking to me I didn't say he didn't in fact probably his best game for Eels. 

        • He's been outstanding, consistently so I might add, for the last 4 seasons. He's been getting incrementally better every year to the point where I wouldn't swap him for any halfback in the league. 

  • no thanks, what a joke

  • I wouldn't mind him as our 14. Wonder what BA could do to his defence. Secondly, he will be a much better back up than fking JA.

  • This reply was deleted.
    • All true, but I must admit to being intrigued by what he could do in a quality system. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Clintorian replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Not to mention all the other teams in Rugby he could be playing in."
1 hour ago
Muttman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"It's now out of the NRL's hands. If the court says the conditions of the release are valid and still stand then that is that. The NRL can't stomp all over the Eels' legal rights.  Lomax told the Eels in writing he was proceeding with the Storm…"
4 hours ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"You'd think it's in the NRL's best interest to be on Parra's side here. If they take the side of Lomax then every player contract means nothing. This is bigger than a single case- it could open up a world where players do whatever they want,…"
4 hours ago
Eelovution replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"When the announcement was made by the Eels regarding the dispute with Lomax, the club made a very important note in their commentary- the agreement was made in 'Good Faith'. This is a very important principle in legal agreements- both parties agree…"
6 hours ago
More…