They were saying on 360 last night Tigers may want to offload him and pay some freight. Would he go any good at hooker?
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"This is our problem players can't be great individually we need the team to be good across the park but it seems very up n down and hence the performance looks very much the same.
I mean the Joash foward pass bombing certain try before halftime.…"
I mean the Joash foward pass bombing certain try before halftime.…"
"Until we start winning some battles in the middle of the park all teams have to do to beat us is roll through the middle and complete it's a simple equation.We are so soft in the middle of the park.I'm seeing it every single week and this goes back…"
"His service was good enough but he isn't creative or a running threat but he can play as a middle forward so I think playing two straight out hookers should end for the eels at least in the short term.
I would start Edwards and have smith on the…"
I would start Edwards and have smith on the…"
"Lucas is fast. Iongi is more craft than pace, which is more important for me. "
Replies
In attack he could offer value, but he'd be a liability in defence. Maybe off the bench
From the figures they were talking (which could be all pure bullshit) for the tigers to get rid of him to another club they would have to pay about half his 2023 salary - $600k was the number provided. Do you think his defence could be improved/adapted to suit dummy half. How would Api Korisau go defending in the halves for example? I'm sure his rate of missed tackles would increase. Brooks is a player that needs a change of scenery
Moses was just as shit and now he is a reliable defender at the Eels. At hooker Brooks will have more support around him.
I think he'll make a great hooker, looks to have a nice backpussy.
Good grief, this comment escalated real quick. I'll take your word for it Kurupt.
He does have speed, and a lefty kick from dummy half is always handy.
No way Brett. You're kidding signing a player who can't defend at hooker.
I didn't say we should sign him Chief, I merely pointed out his good qualities.
Yes well I gathered you'd like a hooker off the bench
How do you know he can't defend at hooker?
Coz I've watched him tackle. You should watch him too that way you'll understand. You don't need to much of a sample size. About 10-15 games should be enough.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
of 10 Next