Luke Brooks

They were saying on 360 last night Tigers may want to offload him and pay some freight. Would he go any good at hooker? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • In attack he could offer value, but he'd be a liability in defence. Maybe off the bench

    • From the figures they were talking (which could be all pure bullshit) for the tigers to get rid of him to another club they would have to pay about half his 2023 salary - $600k was the number provided. Do you think his defence could be improved/adapted to suit dummy half. How would Api Korisau go defending in the halves for example? I'm sure his rate of missed tackles would increase. Brooks is a player that needs a change of scenery 

      • Moses was just as shit and now he is a reliable defender at the Eels. At hooker Brooks will have more support around him. 

        I think he'll make a great hooker, looks to have a nice backpussy.

        • Good grief, this comment escalated real quick. I'll take your word for it Kurupt.

      • He does have speed, and a lefty kick from dummy half is always handy.

        • No way Brett. You're kidding signing a player who can't defend at hooker. 

          • I didn't say we should sign him Chief, I merely pointed out his good qualities. 

          • How do you know he can't defend at hooker?

            • Coz I've watched him tackle. You should watch him too that way you'll understand. You don't need to much of a sample size. About 10-15 games should be enough. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill' Sack ! replied to LB's discussion Parramatta new signing
"I don't get this.  Must be Mark O'Neill’s biggest signing, and a huge opportunity for his outgoing resume "
1 minute ago
LB posted a discussion
Parramatta are pleased to announce the signing of Red Wiggle Simon 😂😂😂😂 
8 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"Both Panthers and Melbourne had similar stats re: possession, completions, errors and infringements. 
But Panthers had 10 linebreaks to 2 and 11 to 5 offloads. Panthers just out-classed the Storm in attack. Ominous signs. It's basically Panthers…"
18 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"Of course you can put a limit on set restarts! They put limits on other things why not set restart ? Mate the system is already being abused putting a limit on set restarts would stop referees affecting the outcome and momentum of games. Penrith are…"
25 minutes ago
More…