Luke Brooks

They were saying on 360 last night Tigers may want to offload him and pay some freight. Would he go any good at hooker? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • In attack he could offer value, but he'd be a liability in defence. Maybe off the bench

    • From the figures they were talking (which could be all pure bullshit) for the tigers to get rid of him to another club they would have to pay about half his 2023 salary - $600k was the number provided. Do you think his defence could be improved/adapted to suit dummy half. How would Api Korisau go defending in the halves for example? I'm sure his rate of missed tackles would increase. Brooks is a player that needs a change of scenery 

      • Moses was just as shit and now he is a reliable defender at the Eels. At hooker Brooks will have more support around him. 

        I think he'll make a great hooker, looks to have a nice backpussy.

        • Good grief, this comment escalated real quick. I'll take your word for it Kurupt.

      • He does have speed, and a lefty kick from dummy half is always handy.

        • No way Brett. You're kidding signing a player who can't defend at hooker. 

          • I didn't say we should sign him Chief, I merely pointed out his good qualities. 

          • How do you know he can't defend at hooker?

            • Coz I've watched him tackle. You should watch him too that way you'll understand. You don't need to much of a sample size. About 10-15 games should be enough. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Nightmare Off-Season replied to LB's discussion Eels interested in Barnett
"Hey LB, how have you been?
If he was a 30+ year old outside back, absolutely, and although it's obviously not ideal, less concerned with middle forwards. 
Also less concerned with age in general than most LB, believe age is less important than other…"
19 minutes ago
macybrown replied to LB's discussion Eels interested in Barnett
"Oh bummer it's for next year then."
20 minutes ago
Eelovution replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels demand the NRL hand over all information relating to its involvement in the Lomax saga
"LB, maybe not us against the world. I think a few other clubs and members are also supporting us. Major ramifications, irrespective of the findings and decisions of the court. It might cut down the power base of Vlandys and friends."
28 minutes ago
The Badger replied to LB's discussion Eels interested in Barnett
"Matti is off contract anyway so he's not an option for a trade. 
Maybe Tuilagi?"
33 minutes ago
More…