Luke Brooks

They were saying on 360 last night Tigers may want to offload him and pay some freight. Would he go any good at hooker? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • In attack he could offer value, but he'd be a liability in defence. Maybe off the bench

    • From the figures they were talking (which could be all pure bullshit) for the tigers to get rid of him to another club they would have to pay about half his 2023 salary - $600k was the number provided. Do you think his defence could be improved/adapted to suit dummy half. How would Api Korisau go defending in the halves for example? I'm sure his rate of missed tackles would increase. Brooks is a player that needs a change of scenery 

      • Moses was just as shit and now he is a reliable defender at the Eels. At hooker Brooks will have more support around him. 

        I think he'll make a great hooker, looks to have a nice backpussy.

        • Good grief, this comment escalated real quick. I'll take your word for it Kurupt.

      • He does have speed, and a lefty kick from dummy half is always handy.

        • No way Brett. You're kidding signing a player who can't defend at hooker. 

          • I didn't say we should sign him Chief, I merely pointed out his good qualities. 

          • How do you know he can't defend at hooker?

            • Coz I've watched him tackle. You should watch him too that way you'll understand. You don't need to much of a sample size. About 10-15 games should be enough. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Randy Handlinger replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"The Seventy Maxims of Maximally Effective Mercenaries clearly states ....#29. The enemy of my enemy is my enemy's enemy. No more. No less."
40 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"As evident in our forums, getting folks to pull their heads in is not as easy as it seems. What if we said Fuck it. WWE needs it's villains
The Parramatta Squeaky-whEels.....We have whinged in these pages forever that we always get shafted. What…"
56 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"Well if there is clear cut evidence ( emails, texts, phone calls, etc...) then how can he deny these allegations with a clear conscience. I'm sure the Eels legal team are not that incompetent to claim these allegations without any evidence. "
1 hour ago
Tin Tim replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"🥱😴"
1 hour ago
More…