Luke Brooks

They were saying on 360 last night Tigers may want to offload him and pay some freight. Would he go any good at hooker? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • In attack he could offer value, but he'd be a liability in defence. Maybe off the bench

    • From the figures they were talking (which could be all pure bullshit) for the tigers to get rid of him to another club they would have to pay about half his 2023 salary - $600k was the number provided. Do you think his defence could be improved/adapted to suit dummy half. How would Api Korisau go defending in the halves for example? I'm sure his rate of missed tackles would increase. Brooks is a player that needs a change of scenery 

      • Moses was just as shit and now he is a reliable defender at the Eels. At hooker Brooks will have more support around him. 

        I think he'll make a great hooker, looks to have a nice backpussy.

        • Good grief, this comment escalated real quick. I'll take your word for it Kurupt.

      • He does have speed, and a lefty kick from dummy half is always handy.

        • No way Brett. You're kidding signing a player who can't defend at hooker. 

          • I didn't say we should sign him Chief, I merely pointed out his good qualities. 

          • How do you know he can't defend at hooker?

            • Coz I've watched him tackle. You should watch him too that way you'll understand. You don't need to much of a sample size. About 10-15 games should be enough. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

ParraEels replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"I don't understand the kick off rule. Can someone explain it"
9 minutes ago
The Badger replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"Soon these boffins at NRL HQ will be setting lines of scrimmage and having conversions from in front for 1 pt ...just so TV in US pay a more for games screening at 3am."
24 minutes ago
LB replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"Yeah Kickoff one is not overly egregious, but is it necessary? Just creates an added thing where majority of the time the opposition will want the ball as each side always wants.
Rest i have no issues with. Rather just have a 19th man and leave…"
25 minutes ago
Bob Smith replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"Meh, ok I s'pose. "
46 minutes ago
More…