Just looking at the ladder and recent results, bulldogs raiders both had strong seasons last year and now look horrible and languishing at the bottom of the table. Yes recruitment and coaching is imporant but you also need a hell of a lot of luck with draw, bounce of ball and injury. I think considering everything that has gone wrong for us in first 10 rounds Ryles has done well. Ciraldo and Ricky not so much 😂
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
Replies
Yes the Bulldogs were dumb playing Galvin out of position and it clearly shows. Very, very dumb. Classic Gus move though - he ends up getting too caught in his own thoughts and makes dumb moves.
I think every single pundit said the same thing - that it made no sense for Galvin to go to the Bulldogs over the Eels. He would have been the perfect answer for us. And Pezet would have been a much better answer for the Bulldogs.
But Adam both things are true. The Eels were the perfect logical choice for Galvin, and our R&R couldn't close the deal. We lost to a club playing him out of position and it's been detrimental for his career.
I don't think this proves the point you think it does. It further proves how inept our R&R was...we were the perfect answer with Brown leaving, we had history with the family, and yet we still lost out.
We didn't lose at all, it isn't an all out go to any lengths competition to sign every single player who becomes available on the market. Galvin going to the dogs has weakened their position significantly (if we win tonight we will pass them on the ladder and we all know how diabolical our season has been).
You place unfair onus on our recruitment and don't take into consideration all circumstances. Galvin for whatever reason was obviously hellbent on going to the dogs one way or another and there was nothing reasonable that we could do to prevent it. All in all this has been an acceptable outcome, not the incompetence you constantly claim to exist.
Galvin is being played out of position. That is why he isn't playing well.
We were intending to play Galvin in position. Where by all historical data he is extremely talented.
I also don't think you have the history correct. By all accounts Galvin was all but signed with Parra and then the Bulldogs did their last minute R&R magic and within 72 hours they won his signature. They stole the cookie from under our noses.
I'm actually just going to stop engaging on this topic. No one is changing anyone's mind and it's getting repetitive and boring. History will tell us whether I'm right or wrong. And I'll happily eat humble pie if I'm wrong and the current setup leads us to the promised land. I don't believe I am wrong, but there's no value from trying to convince others who disagree.
Have a good weekend mate. Up the Eels!
Galvin was never coming to the eels. He agreed to be a bulldog well before West Tigers gave him permission to leave. It had nothing to do with our R&R team. Galvin talking to us, and had everyone believing he was coming to us, was just a smokescreen.
Ciraldo is overrated. People naturally assume because he has Gould behind him, he is a great coach, BULLSHIT. With the roster the dogs have, any half decent coach would have them playing a better brand of football, or at least competing.
Arrogance is his biggest downfall. He won't admit when things aren't working.
The Dogs job is a poison chalice. It is a good job as Gus can get most players you ask for. The issue is working under him would be a punish. Constantly on edge trying to impress him or he will undermine you. Griffin got sacked having him side in the top 4. Gould doesn't care, despite him crying loudly when coaches are sacked saying it's not them and we are too easy getting rid of coaches and he's done it three times prior with Cleary then Griffin then Barrett.
Not only do injuries and suspensions to your own team affect wins and losses throughout the season, but other teams injuries and suspensions and when your team plays them. Often you will see some teams regularly playing against teams near full strength, whilst others seem to get a run of matches against teams with a long injury count plus a suspension or 2. At this stage of the season ( 10 rounds completed ) some teams have had majority of their starting spine players most weeks whereas other teams ( Eels are 1 ) have had 3 of their 4 1st choice spine players unavailable. When you consider that most clubs have a large percentage of their salary cap invested on their 1,6,7 and 9, teams missing 2 or 3 of these players struggle for consistency and wins. Usually your back up / depth players in these key positions are being paid a quarter or less than your top players in the spine.
Another thing I've been thinking about lately is the 30 man roster and if this number needs increasing? With the speed of the game increasing, fatigue injuries are becoming more often. Naming 19 players from a 30 man roster has been difficult for some clubs at this early stage of this season. It's impossible to believe that the injury lists will only get bigger as the season goes on. I believe clubs must apply to the NRL if they need to select a player or players from outside their top 30. The top 30 roster surely must be increased in coming years. I think a top 35 roster is needed moving forward. Depth quality is another concern especially with 2 new clubs entering the competition in the next 2 seasons. One of these new clubs ( Perth Bears )will produce close to zero juniors over the next decade. Hopefully the NRL doesn't rush the 20th team into the competition and they consider junior development numbers wherever they put the 20th club. Surely the south island of New Zealand is the way to go, hopefully not before 2031 or 2032.
I agree. For example, look at manly, the only team they beat without noteworthy injuries was the dragons and if you watched it you'd know that one could easily have gone the other ofher way.
It's not the Dogs attack that's the issue there defense was there identity that's what they've lost.
There inability to turn back attack and defend there errors was there call sign last year.
Defense wins games attack dictates by how much
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
of 5 Next