Replies

  • This is pathetic we lose Lomax, a game changer. That rugby comp not even real. It'll be canned after a year.

  • Not many wingers in the comp that give you 20 carries and nie on 200 metres most weeks.

    If you lose Lomax you'd better have another guy like him because back 5 coming out of yardage guys like him are gold in this nrl.

    • As a fan, I'm slowly losing hope. Who are wwe buying, how the fuck we have no cap room, we're losing a top quality player and the club doesn't care. To win a comp a winger like Lomax you need he's an X factor game changer and we don't give a fuck of letting him go to this fuck ass comp that doesn't exist. Our juniors wingers are ass below average, we so fucking cursed man.

      • I never saw Lomax as x-factor. Talented and reliable

        • Randy Handlinger 

          You never see much Randolph, he is a game changer and carried the team in so many "effort" ways playing injured for most of the season. 

          Who say's he is going anywhere, other than the "spooks" on here...... This site seeems to think Lomax is the only one in this process.... Courier Mail up here has a front page on Payne Haas being offered 10m.

          If these comments from the "primates" on this blog are any indicaton, we will never deserve any Marquis players.

      • Souths are too at the moment. Injuries a losing Gray and possibly Murray to union.

      • I wouldn't say Lomax x-factor. JAC had a better year and more big plays. Just saying.

        Making metres out the back is hard to replace but the kicks in the air only 1 out of 20 worked in our favour. Most of the time he just stuck his hand out and knocked it on I often wondered what is the point if he doesn't intend on catching it.

        We are weaker losing Lomax, but X-factor? He had a nice try v Brisbane catching a Moses kick but he didn't make plays like JAC, Warriors had us on ropes on our line ten into the game, JAC picks up loose ball and runs 110 metres. Changed the game. 
        Iongi made bigger plays.

        Lomax was great but he didn't make big breaks or score individual tries really. Not saying he's not great he is for the work out the back but I wouldn't say X-factor compared to how JAC and sometimes Iongi changed it more than he did.

        • Well what the fcuk are you saying.....excusing yourself for shitting in your pants.

          There are 17 players picked when Lomax plays, he is one of them.....yes him and Moses being out are game breakers.

          No one questions the abilities of the other 15 but these two are the most important on a basis of what the do offer. 

          • What the hell was that response? Did I say Lomax is bad? Did I say we won't miss him? Did I say he is overrated?

            Simply said he is not an X-factor, but doesn't need to be.

            If that was not meant for me I apologise, if it was for me then I stand by the comment.

            • X factor is a relevant term, champions, great, immortals......where he stands for Parra he is as closer to an X factor than anyone else (subjectively)......It was meant for you! 

              Did you say Lomax was bad ....NO....did you say he was not a game changer YES,  Does he score individual tries YES ....Did Reece Walsh not score a individual try from 15 metres and did not run 100 metres to do so YES.....you ran around the issue and wanted it both ways. His kicking and catches were not as good as they had been, your judgement precludes him playing with injuries and maybe being marked much more.....do yo blame Moses for Lomax's not catching the ball because of his entrenchment in telegraphing the move so obviously....Lomax like a good dog still had to chase and fetch.

              Finally it seemed to me that you were arguing he was not be a "bid loss" where I maintain he would be a bloody huge loss..... btw Iongi has a long way to go before he is anything like an x factor.....potential to be one....maybe. Not in the same post code of Weekes, Casey McLean and their peer group, at this stage.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Poupou Escobar replied to Eelawarra's discussion EELS COACH JASON RYLES PUSHED TO SIGN OFF ON ZAC LOMAX’S RELEASE REQUEST - THIS IS WHY
""Zak is under contract" means we're not letting him go unless it suits us."
29 minutes ago
Gaz Nelson replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Vlandys to speak with Haas
"Parra agreeing to let Lomax go so quickly, you can only hope we got a transfser deal"
52 minutes ago
Gucci replied to Eelawarra's discussion EELS COACH JASON RYLES PUSHED TO SIGN OFF ON ZAC LOMAX’S RELEASE REQUEST - THIS IS WHY
"For those that haven't listened to the interview with our goober CEO.
 
https://www.2gb.com/how-well-spend-zacs-money-eels-boss-on-parras-p...
 
Now I usually am pretty good at reading between the lines. Typically when we are asked about player…"
1 hour ago
Frank The Tank replied to Roy tannous's discussion Lomax gone immediately
"Let him cook you reckon?
From where I sit, he's cooking with no gas, no pots and no oil, and we will end up with toast."
1 hour ago
More…