You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"I see what you mean but doesn't it make it better when they make it non quota? Shows they actually deserve it?"
"Well the one thing I will say is if he does go, don't rip up the contract. It can be used to our advantage if and when he comes back. I would love to know what we do with a transfer fee, where does the money go? If, and we cant, we can put that…"
"As i say mate we will just have to wait and see what eventuates hey . Players come and go all the time . In saying that if he does go and breaks his contract with us then that's something that i just can't take . Untill this all comes to a head ill…"
"Saying X-factor puts him in same bracket as Cleary and Walsh for example. Those two particularly are X-factor no question."
Replies
Not many wingers in the comp that give you 20 carries and nie on 200 metres most weeks.
If you lose Lomax you'd better have another guy like him because back 5 coming out of yardage guys like him are gold in this nrl.
As a fan, I'm slowly losing hope. Who are wwe buying, how the fuck we have no cap room, we're losing a top quality player and the club doesn't care. To win a comp a winger like Lomax you need he's an X factor game changer and we don't give a fuck of letting him go to this fuck ass comp that doesn't exist. Our juniors wingers are ass below average, we so fucking cursed man.
I never saw Lomax as x-factor. Talented and reliable
Randy Handlinger
You never see much Randolph, he is a game changer and carried the team in so many "effort" ways playing injured for most of the season.
Who say's he is going anywhere, other than the "spooks" on here...... This site seeems to think Lomax is the only one in this process.... Courier Mail up here has a front page on Payne Haas being offered 10m.
If these comments from the "primates" on this blog are any indicaton, we will never deserve any Marquis players.
Souths are too at the moment. Injuries a losing Gray and possibly Murray to union.
I wouldn't say Lomax x-factor. JAC had a better year and more big plays. Just saying.
Making metres out the back is hard to replace but the kicks in the air only 1 out of 20 worked in our favour. Most of the time he just stuck his hand out and knocked it on I often wondered what is the point if he doesn't intend on catching it.
We are weaker losing Lomax, but X-factor? He had a nice try v Brisbane catching a Moses kick but he didn't make plays like JAC, Warriors had us on ropes on our line ten into the game, JAC picks up loose ball and runs 110 metres. Changed the game.
Iongi made bigger plays.
Lomax was great but he didn't make big breaks or score individual tries really. Not saying he's not great he is for the work out the back but I wouldn't say X-factor compared to how JAC and sometimes Iongi changed it more than he did.
Well what the fcuk are you saying.....excusing yourself for shitting in your pants.
There are 17 players picked when Lomax plays, he is one of them.....yes him and Moses being out are game breakers.
No one questions the abilities of the other 15 but these two are the most important on a basis of what the do offer.
What the hell was that response? Did I say Lomax is bad? Did I say we won't miss him? Did I say he is overrated?
Simply said he is not an X-factor, but doesn't need to be.
If that was not meant for me I apologise, if it was for me then I stand by the comment.
Saying X-factor puts him in same bracket as Cleary and Walsh for example. Those two particularly are X-factor no question.
Why did the Broncos win a comp with 2 wingers who wouldn't cost over 300k each??? Wingers aren't everything and 700k for Lomax is ridiculous. The Storm Wingers aren't on that much
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
of 8 Next