From The Sydney Morning Herald...

Melbourne’s pursuit of Zac Lomax could prove more costly than expected if the NRL deems the club’s promise to cover the exiled winger’s legal bills should be included in the Storm’s salary cap.

Parramatta began legal proceedings to prevent Lomax from joining the Storm, given his release from a four-year contract was contingent on the Eels providing written consent. The Blues winger was granted a release to join rebel rugby competition R360, but has been left in limbo after its inaugural season was put back until 2028.

Lomax’s hopes of making his Melbourne debut against former club Parramatta in the opening round have been thwarted after his court hearing was scheduled to end a day after the AAMI Park clash.

According to court documents made available last week, the Eels claim the Storm indemnified Lomax’s court expenses.

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/lomax-legal-promise-could-create-salary-cap-headache-for-storm-20260218-p5o39m.html

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

          • Yeah they have backs but also how often do they get Origin talent?

      • Less about us being luck/beneficiaries and Brisbane or another premiership contender seeings it as an opportunity to hurt their rival in the Strom. The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

    • Dynasty, do you realise that Walker is 32 next birthday and De Bellin is 34 and Paulo 33. I could not imagine seeing Walker in great demand, 2 years may see him out of Parra into retirement. The 2 forwards De Bellin and Paulo will have there time constrained by there performances, we have players now playing to 36.

      Do you also understand that Nikore moved back to NZ to be with his very sick wife and his children, he never wanted to leave in the first place. Nikore also is a very inconsistent player that has his moments within matches but is no where the potential of what we have.

      I don't know if you concocted this "pracy" using AI but are all those thoughts and structures your's originally?

      • No AI

      • Swap out Jackson Ford for Marata then. Ford is a goer who is from Wollongong I believe. 

    • 🥱😴

  • Many in the media are saying it could be resolved on the steps of the court, meaning agreement made before court date. I just do not see that happening.

    Both teams have done things in spite of the other, it has gotten so bitter neither one will cave unless forced to. If Eels win, Storm more likely just brush their hands and move on. Imagine being hellbent In not letting go for a player then giving us a player for him? Thats a loss to them. As long as they get Lomax for somewhat their terms that's a win for them, they couldn't care less about the court case or how they look.

    Parra won't also back down on what they want. So I do not see how there is an end to this other than Melbourne moving on elsewhere. Making it a "you didn't dump me, I dumped you" scenario. 

    • I predict the Storm will dump Lomax prior to the court date. At the moment they have nothing on the line except for a promise to finance Lomax' legal bills. That would be a rounding error for Tripp's bank account. Given his experience in the wagering industry, he will know when to dump before his odds of winning are no longer in his favour. 

  • If you look at storm team list for their trials, you can see why they desperately want Lomax. 0 depth at the club so they are panicking and being desperate 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"Phone calls are harder as you can't prove what was said unless it was tapped. Emails and the rest yeah. Parra had this in their back pocket for a while and were waiting for the final nail to drop and them threatening us with cap penalties was the…"
49 minutes ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"I am not saying we shouldn't try, just if we lose and it is a possibility even if slight, that's more likely what happens. If that does happen then it is us against the NRL mentality to fuel us."
52 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"The Seventy Maxims of Maximally Effective Mercenaries clearly states ....#29. The enemy of my enemy is my enemy's enemy. No more. No less."
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"As evident in our forums, getting folks to pull their heads in is not as easy as it seems. What if we said Fuck it. WWE needs it's villains
The Parramatta Squeaky-whEels.....We have whinged in these pages forever that we always get shafted. What…"
1 hour ago
More…