Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?

When Zac Lomax approached the Eels hierarchy in 2025 that he would like to depart the club only one year into a four year deal, it was clear the representative winger was going his own way.

Parramatta, while not exactly keen to release a marquee signing so soon after joining the club, have got a clear view of wanting players to be all in. There is no equivocating, no half-committing. In or out.

So with Lomax stating he wasn't exactly committed to the cause, the decision was made to grant him a conditional release. That condition of course being that the Eels retain his NRL contract and have veto power if he wishes to return to the NRL with another club before the completion of that contract.

Athletes, particularly in rugby league due to both the violent nature of the sport and its relatively small commercial market, have a limited opportunity to make money which their bodies will then pay for later.

CTE and the results of head impacts aside which are well documented and continue to be an issue, relatively young men who have entered rugby league retirement will deal with the results of their sport for the rest of their lives.

Taniela Tuiaki and Jharal Yow-Yeh will never run again. Even Eels legend Nathan Hindmarsh has dealt with the results of his 330 game career, having a hip replacement before the age of 50.

So no one begrudges them wanting to make money.

But the Lomax case is a now a case study of how to blow up your career with one decision. R360 was, is and remains a pipe dream. No coaches, no clubs, no stadiums. A narrative pushed in the media with little substance.

It's the NFT of the sporting world.

Yet Lomax was advised by his manager that this was a good bet. That manager, Clinton Schifcofske, should honestly have his agent accreditation stripped following this. His advice was beyond reckless and he's left his client up a creek without a paddle.

While the Melbourne Storm willing to take on a player with this much baggage, it's clear the Eels aren't going to budge without a significant player transfer. And all credit to the Eels management for voicing that publicly to put pressure on the Storm.

It also seems the Lomax and his agent are ignorant to rugby league history. It's not the first time the Eels have played hardball with a player who has walked after signing a deal.

Jamie Lyon disappeared from the club in 2004, before fleeing to England where he spent 3 years to allow his contract to expire before returning to the NRL. I know this is an oversimpification of the Lyon saga, but the result was a 3 year stint in the cold north of England.

Yet Lyon was just 22 when he left. A 3 year overseas stint meant he returned at the peak of his playing powers.

Lomax is 26, turning 27 this year. If he were forced to sit out his contract or play overseas, it's likely he'd only return at the end of his professional career, well short of the money and acclaim he'd have achieved had he remained with the Eels.

Perhaps another parallel to be drawn is with another former Dragon in Gorden Tallis, who signed with the Broncos during Super League, but following the delay of the Super League season, chose to sit out the final year of his Dragons contract than play for the club.

Again, not a like-for-like, given Tallis had a contract with another club. But it goes to show again that ignoring what has happened to other players in the past means you can end up making the same mistake.

At the end of this saga. Whether Lomax ends up landing in Melbourne because the Storm cough up their own marquee player to the Eels, or he's forced to sit some or part of his contract, or he ends up returning to the blue and gold, Lomax has only damaged himself.

Parramatta has received the full support of the other 15 clubs not involved in this matter. The NRL would be incentivised to back Parramatta's stance given it's an NRL contract Lomax is seeking to break. Perhaps most interestingly has been the lack of visibility of the RLPA. 

The RLPA has steadily resisted calls for intra-season transfer windows, arguing it hurts players. Well Lomax has just undermined all that by walking out on a long term contract before returning and then asking to switch states, all within a 3 month period.

Ultimately though, it seems regardless of the outcome, Lomax is set to earn less than he was at the Eels, while putting himself in a poor position for any future contract negotiations with other clubs, who would be hesitant to offer him a long-term, high money deal, knowing he's likely to up and move when the situation doesn't suit.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Lomax still believes r360 will happen.

    He only wants to join the storm for 1.5 seasons to join r360 in July for preseason.

     

  • Problem with Lomax is he and his advisers (Clint Shit-kofski) thinks he is the next SBW. Quite different situation to Lyon and Tallis.
    They think he can earn big $ in R360 as well as a MMA fighter (eventually).
    If he knuckles down, and only at 26, he could earn $8m by the time his NRL career is over (with rep money). Instead he thinks he can chase a bigger pay day alsewhere because 'he thinks' he's a supreme athlete.

    ATM it's come back to bite him. A downgrade from his Dragons contract ($800K), and now no contract at all. Still chasing that big pay day.

  • Suck shit buddy you're not that good and your defence at centre is terrible.

  • I have a feeling Melbourne will go cold on this now that we have called their bluff. Not sure where that leaves the situation. It's unfathomable what Schifcofske has done here. What's more baffling is that the media seems to have left him alone. 

    • If Melbourne go cold, which I think is possible, do not be surprised if a team like Sydney City come in.

  • Lomax's agent now saying he left because Arthur was sacked and Gutho left. 

    A grade sook! 

    • I heard him say that on Kenty podcast. Kent pretty much laughed at him when he said Lomax goes for a challenge, Kent said yeah and money too. He saw through the rubbish.

      But at the same time, Gillis is doing exactly what he should be doing, supporting his clients. 

      Also, from what i have heard BA and Centre were factors but R360 money was the #1 reason for leaving.

  • Being reported that Steve Gillies the other half to, his and Clinton Schifcofske's sports management company GS Sports Management is now releasing statements favouring Lomax and attempting to explain and clear a path for his return to the NRL.

    It has always been Schifcofski that has released the statements re Lomax. A lot more going on behind the scenes. Just imagine Lomax was supposed to be on close to a Million now after sigining with McGreggor as St George coach promising him the fullback spot moving forward. Griffen moves him to centre and then drops him from the team all together.   Flanagan comes in and moves him to the wing. Losing $$ with every coach, is not a great plan.
    'Brad Arthur promises him Centre and a shot at fullback, should be on $700k this year, Ryles comes in and moves him back to Wing. Lomax agitates again for R360 ending up with only a $180K offer from Union. 
    'The way he is being managed must be in question, Zac's priorities and a thirst to self sabotage himself when in good positions is such a sad indictment.
    The all in argument is an interesting one Super. I feel it may be more then just that, we have Pezet ( which i agree with) not really all in for the long haul but he is welcome. Sort of 2 standards there or is it just  an easy way to box and describe the Lomax release. 
    The Eels hold all the rights to Lomax as an NRL player for the next 3 years, (and the club should be congratulated for putting in conditions on his release) a suitor will come at some point, it's like squirrelling money away in shares and waiting for the market to pay a dividend.
    A lot of bridges must of been burnt by him at the Eels, as he is obviously not welcome back in Parradise. There must be so much more to the relationship between Lomax and Ryles.
    Any chance he may play for the Eels this year on $350k. Thats a lot better then $0 sitting at home watching the NRL on tv. 
    'I know all other clubs are behind the Eels in this saga, but it may just take one of those clubs to offer us something in the long run for Lomax's contract.
    • He'll be back in the nrl eventually but eels going to make him sweat and get something out of it. No rush at all for parra 🤣

      • Sarantinos pretty much laid it out to Melbourne and all NRL clubs, pretty much if we receive something very good whether cap space or a rep player, he can leave. Ball is now in the court of the other 16 teams whoever can make the best trade offer. 

        Ryles will have final say, they let him dictate a lot of what is happening. The call to pretty much tell the club captain and 200+ game player, also a 100+ club game Prop that they are not wanted, as soon as he got there is a sign how much this club backs Ryles.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Longfin Eel replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"Yep exactly LB. Ryles is calling the shots here. It's comforting knowing that the club is backing his decisions. We would not be able to promote such a strong position if the club was not completely united. "
30 minutes ago
HH - Love You Iongi Time! replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"Before this saga did anyone think that Samrani was Ryles pet project to mirror a player like Howarth?"
44 minutes ago
LB replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"Sarantinos pretty much laid it out to Melbourne and all NRL clubs, pretty much if we receive something very good whether cap space or a rep player, he can leave. Ball is now in the court of the other 16 teams whoever can make the best trade…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"I heard him say that on Kenty podcast. Kent pretty much laughed at him when he said Lomax goes for a challenge, Kent said yeah and money too. He saw through the rubbish.
But at the same time, Gillis is doing exactly what he should be doing,…"
1 hour ago
More…