Lomax gone immediately

Laters bro...

 

Eels' Club Statement

"The Parramatta Eels can confirm that Zac Lomax has been granted an immediate release from his playing contract to pursue opportunities outside the NRL.

The Club would like to thank Zac for his contribution during his time with the Eels in 2025 and we wish him all the best for the future."

 

Foxsport Article

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

          • You cannot place limits on who managers speak with, regardless of what vlandys in his cranky pants

            • The NRL can't stop them from speaking to others, but they can de-register any player managers they want to. Particularly if those player managers are actively doing things that will threaten the NRL itself. 

              • No. They can't.

                Why did they allow Issac Moses to re-register? Why not just boot him altogether....it's because they couldn't,

                 

                • They can ban them indefinetely. Like registering players, the NRL isn't compelled to accredit any player agent. There is no legal requirement for the NRL to accredit a player agent. 

                  In the case of Moses, I'd say he had way too many players on his books and the NRL could have lost significant talent if he wasn't re-registered. It was in their interests to do it. With someone like Schifcofske, it might not be the case. 

                  • Lost talent to where? Yawnion? Hockey?  They just would have found another accredited agent.

                    If NRL could punt agents at will Issac would be gone

                    • Until you can prove the NRL are forced to accredit player agents, or that they cannot permanently ban player agents accreditation, I will never agree with your opinion. 

            • No you can't place limits on who managers can speak with but the NRL has every right to decide who plays in their competition.

              If they decide not to register a players contract, there's fuck all the players can do about it.

          • He was released on request to take up an offer from R360.

            The ban will apply.

            • Only if the NRL choose to enforce it. The player being released allows the NRL to re-sign them and still save face. If Payne Haas or Reece Walsh goes, then decides they want to come back, do you really think the NRL will stand their ground on the ban? I doubt it. 

              • Say 15 top shelf players leave and 7 realize after one season that they hate it...lifestyle, game, everything? The idea that they would be denied re-entry is hilarious to me. Clubs will be tripping over themselves to get these blokes and it will be vlandys head on the block

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Joel K replied to LB's discussion North Queensland Cowboys Winger Murray Taulagi set to exit Cowboys, could he be an option for Parramatta?
"He's been linked with Titans and Dragons for a few months now. Some people are saying Dragons are a done deal with Taulagi"
1 minute ago
Snottie Pimpin replied to Snottie Pimpin's discussion Clinton Schifcofske
"I get the feeling Ryles was never a huge fan of Zac. Sounds like he couldn't grant the release soon enough. "
9 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to LB's discussion North Queensland Cowboys Winger Murray Taulagi set to exit Cowboys, could he be an option for Parramatta?
"I could live with that over the other options provided namely Garrick Talau and alike.
Question is would they move JAC to the other side.
Hes got the run metres and size that we need also.
Get it done Parra R and R."
10 minutes ago
iamnot replied to Roy tannous's discussion Lomax gone immediately
"Until you can prove the NRL are forced to accredit player agents, or that they cannot permanently ban player agents accreditation, I will never agree with your opinion. "
15 minutes ago
More…