I hope they go hard for Leo Thompson. He plays with aggression and effort. 550k would be a great buy.
EA > Graham polkinghorneOctober 12, 2024 at 10:47am
I think Ryles would have gone for him hard if he was able to offload more of our expensive forwards. I expect to see a much different forward pack in 2 years with Lane, Matto, Joe O, Paulo all gone.
"Yes we have trouble attracting talent but paying overs just to get a deal done is stupid. It is better to target younger unknown players and develop them. If you sign someone on overs it shows they are just after money so there are 2 likely…"
"Great post, Bluey.
Fan perception and reality are two different things. Patience is another matter altogether.
By "we too must buy" using the Panthers example, I think you mean Hollywood "big names," right? To be more like the Broncos, Roosters,…"
"If he is top 30, then it is a deal already in place when he signed last year. This would not be a reaction to Lomax leaving.
Similar to like Latu and Funa-Iuta, who are on development for 2026 and top 30 2027."
Replies
He is on 300k at Knights, easily affordable for eels
Well he would want a big upgrade. $500k is well worth it for him.
Woof woof 🐶
Don't think we need another prop, but I'm a fan
Naaah. I really don't want anymore forwards, unless its an edge.
EDIT: let me add that this not because I don't rate him. I think he's actually quite a good player. But I think we have other priorities.
I hope they go hard for Leo Thompson. He plays with aggression and effort. 550k would be a great buy.
I think Ryles would have gone for him hard if he was able to offload more of our expensive forwards. I expect to see a much different forward pack in 2 years with Lane, Matto, Joe O, Paulo all gone.
Do people on here try to spell peoples names wrong on purpose? Happens like everyday... surely Thompson ain't a hard one.
Like how people say Longi?
You tellem , Juck.
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next