I hope they go hard for Leo Thompson. He plays with aggression and effort. 550k would be a great buy.
EA > Graham polkinghorneOctober 12, 2024 at 10:47am
I think Ryles would have gone for him hard if he was able to offload more of our expensive forwards. I expect to see a much different forward pack in 2 years with Lane, Matto, Joe O, Paulo all gone.
"It appears to me that the Lomax camp, his handlers, Storm and the NRL have all suffered with premature ejaculation. That got too excited early on.
Lomax thought R360 was starting, Storm thought he got a clearance, and the clowns at NRL registered a…"
"I'm not sure how a court could determine what is a fair settlemt in the NRL sphere. Unless they use the value of Lomax contract as a baseline, or do you use the precedent set by the Dogs when they paid Brisbane $500k for Oloapu? There are far too…"
Replies
He is on 300k at Knights, easily affordable for eels
Well he would want a big upgrade. $500k is well worth it for him.
Woof woof 🐶
Don't think we need another prop, but I'm a fan
Naaah. I really don't want anymore forwards, unless its an edge.
EDIT: let me add that this not because I don't rate him. I think he's actually quite a good player. But I think we have other priorities.
I hope they go hard for Leo Thompson. He plays with aggression and effort. 550k would be a great buy.
I think Ryles would have gone for him hard if he was able to offload more of our expensive forwards. I expect to see a much different forward pack in 2 years with Lane, Matto, Joe O, Paulo all gone.
Do people on here try to spell peoples names wrong on purpose? Happens like everyday... surely Thompson ain't a hard one.
Like how people say Longi?
You tellem , Juck.
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next