I hope they go hard for Leo Thompson. He plays with aggression and effort. 550k would be a great buy.
EA > Graham polkinghorneOctober 12, 2024 at 10:47am
I think Ryles would have gone for him hard if he was able to offload more of our expensive forwards. I expect to see a much different forward pack in 2 years with Lane, Matto, Joe O, Paulo all gone.
"The Eels were worse than an under 10's side. Error ridden, poor defence, poor discipline, poor decisions in attack absolutely woeful. I don't understand what Ryles is actually doing with this team. They deserve the wooden spoon 🥄 🥄 with today's…"
"Re Joash getting experience, incrementally yes it would work ok ...whole bloody game with another rookie half and an experienced one on bench no! It's unfair on all!"
Not sure what ryles was thinking here. If you are going to push brown out of the halves but him in the centres for Russell. I can understand him wanting to adjust to life without brown but fuck me you play him or you don't. Not this half assed play…
Replies
He is on 300k at Knights, easily affordable for eels
Well he would want a big upgrade. $500k is well worth it for him.
Woof woof 🐶
Don't think we need another prop, but I'm a fan
Naaah. I really don't want anymore forwards, unless its an edge.
EDIT: let me add that this not because I don't rate him. I think he's actually quite a good player. But I think we have other priorities.
I hope they go hard for Leo Thompson. He plays with aggression and effort. 550k would be a great buy.
I think Ryles would have gone for him hard if he was able to offload more of our expensive forwards. I expect to see a much different forward pack in 2 years with Lane, Matto, Joe O, Paulo all gone.
Do people on here try to spell peoples names wrong on purpose? Happens like everyday... surely Thompson ain't a hard one.
Like how people say Longi?
You tellem , Juck.