I hope they go hard for Leo Thompson. He plays with aggression and effort. 550k would be a great buy.
EA > Graham polkinghorneOctober 12, 2024 at 10:47am
I think Ryles would have gone for him hard if he was able to offload more of our expensive forwards. I expect to see a much different forward pack in 2 years with Lane, Matto, Joe O, Paulo all gone.
"Nine.com.au. Wide world of sports. The Mole. Insta, Facebook,
'There is a lot of gee up Hoe in what i posted for sure, there was meant to be. But i got the original from Nine.com.au.
Quote" Souths and Parramatta, the two clubs who missed out on…"
"I reckon clubs should have the option to play anyone in the top 30 man squad, so if any key player goes down you can have a like for like replacement - still with a maximum 8 interchanges.
The way it's structured now it disadvantages teams who are…"
"Joel, does this article really state "expected to show interest"? Comical if true. Where is it out of curiosity: Zerotackle, TikTok, facebook? Sounds like it's written by one of our site's patrons to gee us up."
Replies
He is on 300k at Knights, easily affordable for eels
Well he would want a big upgrade. $500k is well worth it for him.
Woof woof 🐶
Don't think we need another prop, but I'm a fan
Naaah. I really don't want anymore forwards, unless its an edge.
EDIT: let me add that this not because I don't rate him. I think he's actually quite a good player. But I think we have other priorities.
I hope they go hard for Leo Thompson. He plays with aggression and effort. 550k would be a great buy.
I think Ryles would have gone for him hard if he was able to offload more of our expensive forwards. I expect to see a much different forward pack in 2 years with Lane, Matto, Joe O, Paulo all gone.
Do people on here try to spell peoples names wrong on purpose? Happens like everyday... surely Thompson ain't a hard one.
Like how people say Longi?
You tellem , Juck.
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next