I hope they go hard for Leo Thompson. He plays with aggression and effort. 550k would be a great buy.
EA > Graham polkinghorneOctober 12, 2024 at 10:47am
I think Ryles would have gone for him hard if he was able to offload more of our expensive forwards. I expect to see a much different forward pack in 2 years with Lane, Matto, Joe O, Paulo all gone.
"While I try to avoid it occasionally Ill see a comment in the side bar that is so ridiculous that I will get sucked in. I have strong opinions but I dont come here for political opinion. If its not showing in the right hand side bar its easier to…"
"Excellent idea HOE, if that's what people choose to involve themselves in go for it but it shouldn't be on the main page where the rest of us have to tolerate it."
"Yeah but I don't see 'The Cave', what is it?
On the footy side of things, the fact that it's raw and not full of unicorns is also what makes it appealing. I sometimes hope players and their families don't stumble across some posts , but that's how a…"
Replies
He is on 300k at Knights, easily affordable for eels
Well he would want a big upgrade. $500k is well worth it for him.
Woof woof 🐶
Don't think we need another prop, but I'm a fan
Naaah. I really don't want anymore forwards, unless its an edge.
EDIT: let me add that this not because I don't rate him. I think he's actually quite a good player. But I think we have other priorities.
I hope they go hard for Leo Thompson. He plays with aggression and effort. 550k would be a great buy.
I think Ryles would have gone for him hard if he was able to offload more of our expensive forwards. I expect to see a much different forward pack in 2 years with Lane, Matto, Joe O, Paulo all gone.
Do people on here try to spell peoples names wrong on purpose? Happens like everyday... surely Thompson ain't a hard one.
Like how people say Longi?
You tellem , Juck.
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next