Kelma 3 weeks for crusher.

Luckily we have a host of players returning next round including Moretti Tuaviti Bailey so Williams can move to the edge or Samrani. 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

      • Im sure we'll be fine. We'll keep signing more depth players until we have so many we're just a depth squad that other teams use for warm up and practice matches

        No mention of the STG player who hit Iongi with the crusher, is there?

        • Throwing depth players in at the deep-end reads like it should work good, but...

           

      • You can see as soon as Kelma realised he had JDB in that awkward crusher position, he let go immediately. There was no intent. I'm not saying he should get off completely, but definitely not 3 weeks. 

  • Deadset joke. It was clearly accidental due to De Belin turning his back to the opposition.

    Not sure how Flanagan escaped suspension. He was a bit late and Iongi was already on the ground. There was no need to land on his his head.

    If the NRL are serious about stamping out crusher tackles maybe they need to stop players turning their backs to the defence in an attempt to off load. It is the main reason it happens.

    • 100% no intent in it just fell into it but that's the nrl these days. 

  • It's just another example of NRL corruption at its finest

  • We're roll over and take it again. We never want to rock the boat when it comes to the NRL. We're the good little boys of the sport eager to please the school teacher. No wonder they are not scared of us at all.
    No way Gould would accept this quietly if it was Bulldogs. He'd have his say in the press, the NRL would come out and say they're 'investigating the comments' but they wouldn't do anything about it. And the Dogs players magically get the rub of the green on and off the field. It's not a coincidence. 

    • Given the supposed 'financial health' of the club, you'd think $20K fine for ripping into the refs/MRC would be worth it, if not just to bring it to light.

      Truth is, they cant have a rookie coach upstage their former clubs and like what has been said before, it isnt in the interest for Eels to be top performers as eels fans will spend money regardless

    • Is it because our FO executives do not have any footy knowledge that they just accept what was dealt by the MRC to their players? Are they just looking at going to the judiciary an unnecessary expense that will reduce their cash flow?

      • Highly probable. Fines that the club is liable for would definitely impact a profit/loss statement. Its all about the $$

        The only way we as fans can make our voices heard is through the same way, stop spending money. Maybe then the club might focus on bringing the team up from the cellar and providing actual value to fans as opposed to the BS social content being driven down our throats

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Boom!! 4yr deal Eels Silva
"That extra 1/2yrs probably sealed it."
1 minute ago
Eels95 replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Boom!! 4yr deal Eels Silva
"I like the way Ryles learnt from the Galvin situation.  When asked on the radio about TDS, he gave nothing away. Just said we are interested but so are lots of clubs. He would have known we were red hot favourites but didn't want to be caught…"
3 minutes ago
Hector replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Boom!! 4yr deal Eels Silva
"Agree  i reconWe wont be losing Ryley either "
4 minutes ago
don robinson replied to Comedian's discussion Is it just me?
"Look at it this way. Which ref has the most try assists
 Which bunker official has the most try assists.
 
The most tries in the season according to the Dally M should shorely  be a referee.
 "
5 minutes ago
More…