Kane Linnett

Reports emerging Parra may offer out of favour Cowboy Kane Linnett a small cheap deal. Not to play first grade lol don’t worry, but as depth & cover in the backs.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • LOL, massive plodder.   Seems right up BA's moneyball alley.

    • Haha!

      Just what the club has been looking for!

  • That’ll fucken do me
  • There is a reason he is out of favour.
  • He is a premiership winner. He’d be on minimum wage and would only play through injury or suspension. Not like he’d come here to be a consistent first grader.

    but yeah let’s all be negative 

    • You kidding James?

      Why not use that spot to develop a junior?

      • Because we already have a bunch of juniors in next year's top 30. Linnett is a premiership winner with nearly 200 NRL games. We don't have much experience in the squad, but we have heaps of youth. This bloke is only 30 next year as well. The Cowboys are cutting him because they already have plenty of experience in their squad.

        • LOL!!  Well Pou has endorsed the signing, so we know its a mistake.

          • There are pros and cons to any signing.

            • The whole of your heritage is made up of pros and cons (prostitutes and criminals)..... and look how it turned out, does that make it ok?

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

EA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"We are so stacked at fullback that I would move Bloomfield to centre. Bamblett and Davis still there with Papalii and Twiddle in cup. Then we got a player in HM coming through named Lorima Seuseu. Only 16 next year. So a year young for HM. So…"
39 minutes ago
Michael W. replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"I like the signing of Kelly, it gives our outside backs, Russell and Simmonson a bit of competition. Most of the narrative around Kelly's signing has been about his terrible defence. I watched four Titans games from this year, his defence is not as…"
4 hours ago
Michael W. replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"It's a footy forum, and that should be it. We've lost quite a few good posters the last few years, I don't know whether it's because of politics, religion, racism, language or we have lost them because of the lack of success the club has had for…"
4 hours ago
Perpetual Motion replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"I read a few eels forums and there is always lots of infighting. Seperating the politics is a good idea as it is toxic and devisive. I actually think think the quality of this site has improved somewhat in the last year or so. "
5 hours ago
More…