Reports emerging Parra may offer out of favour Cowboy Kane Linnett a small cheap deal. Not to play first grade lol don’t worry, but as depth & cover in the backs.
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"I see what you did there, Randy. The logic of transitive relations can be, as we say in class in front of the kids, a bitch. "
"You stink, Randy. Look at that sentence not ending in a period. Shame. Shame!"
"If the Eels were going along with the publicised 10 year ban, and Lomax approached them to come back, they would not be able to accept him back. The timing may be relevant to Melbourne's argument that "Parramatta didn't want him back".
However,…"
However,…"
"Shit that is a Pandora's box you have opened. His point regardless of personal politics (which you raise with no reason) is the fact of "injustices" effecting legal decisions. I think is not right for you to have a crack at PT because he was…"
Replies
LOL, massive plodder. Seems right up BA's moneyball alley.
Haha!
Just what the club has been looking for!
He is a premiership winner. He’d be on minimum wage and would only play through injury or suspension. Not like he’d come here to be a consistent first grader.
but yeah let’s all be negative
You kidding James?
Why not use that spot to develop a junior?
Because we already have a bunch of juniors in next year's top 30. Linnett is a premiership winner with nearly 200 NRL games. We don't have much experience in the squad, but we have heaps of youth. This bloke is only 30 next year as well. The Cowboys are cutting him because they already have plenty of experience in their squad.
LOL!! Well Pou has endorsed the signing, so we know its a mistake.
There are pros and cons to any signing.
The whole of your heritage is made up of pros and cons (prostitutes and criminals)..... and look how it turned out, does that make it ok?
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
of 5 Next