Reports emerging Parra may offer out of favour Cowboy Kane Linnett a small cheap deal. Not to play first grade lol don’t worry, but as depth & cover in the backs.
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Chiefy, I didn't raise the moderation issue. It was thrown at me even though I'm not a mod. Can you imagine me moderating. I would ban you first, for misspelling Cheefy as Chiefy and for hinting that a wide mustache is cool. I mean obviously that…"
"Cannot tackle "
"So you just want ordinary players and young guys that Nathan Brown and a rookie coach can "develop". Stephen Kearny tried this approach. How'd that work out? It lead to a 10 year rebuilding that culminated in one prelim final and a GF.
Try harder. …"
Try harder. …"
"Spot on, Bourbs. The ultimate solution to disliking external moderation is to self moderate. We would then have more scope in discussions because they would not costantly spill over into personal invective. I don't agree with the pining for the…"
Replies
LOL, massive plodder. Seems right up BA's moneyball alley.
Haha!
Just what the club has been looking for!
He is a premiership winner. He’d be on minimum wage and would only play through injury or suspension. Not like he’d come here to be a consistent first grader.
but yeah let’s all be negative
You kidding James?
Why not use that spot to develop a junior?
Because we already have a bunch of juniors in next year's top 30. Linnett is a premiership winner with nearly 200 NRL games. We don't have much experience in the squad, but we have heaps of youth. This bloke is only 30 next year as well. The Cowboys are cutting him because they already have plenty of experience in their squad.
LOL!! Well Pou has endorsed the signing, so we know its a mistake.
There are pros and cons to any signing.
The whole of your heritage is made up of pros and cons (prostitutes and criminals)..... and look how it turned out, does that make it ok?
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
of 5 Next