Replies

  • I don't think there's much wrong with this to be honest. He can stay at the Roosters, be a premiership contender, or chase some extra dollars and be scrapping to be in the 8. We'd be talking about similar scenarios for the likes of Reed and Papa for us. They'd probably take a little less if it means they're getting to challenge for a comp rather than scrape into the 8.

    Not everything is a conspiracy.

    • This reply was deleted.
      • That's where I'm coming from also Brissy.

      • Because whilst those numbers sound correct I'll bet dollars to donuts that the numbers the NRL have are very different. This is why the NRL needs to publish player wages including registered TPA's. Only when the world can see that Tedesco is actually on the cap for only $600k (hypothetically) can we begin to fix the very obvious inequities in the system. 

        • This reply was deleted.
          • Hang on, I've never said not to publish player salaries, on the contrary I'm all for it, because there is precedent for salaries to be published. IMS, under ASIC regs, the five highest paid executives of any publicly listed company must have their salaries published for shareholder knowledge. 
            This principle also applies to pro athletes. 

            • This reply was deleted.
              • Nup, not moi

              • It must've been Super objecting to salaries being published. However I thought until now it was Brett that'd previously objected to it too Brissy on older threads. 

      • Add to that list for 2022 Paul MOMIROVSKI from the Penrith Panthers premiership winning team.

    • It's just naive to believe the Roosters are actually paying him less.

      He is being paid somewhere, somehow. No money will be left on the table.

  • It truly is a farce. There's just no way a player stays for unders that severe. It's being made up in other ways. Other ways that are undeclared to the NRL. 

    • "soo 100k on this hole Joey, I am a shit golfer, so i may lose"

      Nick to Joey

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Blue Eel replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"Oh I wouldn't worry GM about Pops too much, if he is engaging with you that means you've had something to say, and something worth responding too. Thats just as valuable on this site as anyone else's opinion.
👍"
1 minute ago
Snottie Pimpin replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"Reached the highest level ? He saw himself as a centre and reluctantly played wing . There is nothing surer than him getting sick of rugby sooner rather than later and going somewhere else from there . Who cares where players like him don't win…"
35 minutes ago
iamnot replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"You're right. He looked done with rugby league before he got to us. He's not looking at coming back at all. "
42 minutes ago
Gucci replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"Sell his contract rights to a team with cap space and something to offer us. Raiders or Roosters. We dont want Toby Sexton or some Superleage Centre no other clubs wanted. Otherwise keep him out of the game until 2029.
Although, in all seriousness,…"
57 minutes ago
More…