If the NRL can't see there's a problem with this shit, then the same top clubs will continually stay strong.
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Yes but why do we need them now.
As soon as the decision to release Lomax was agreed to that had to be the #1 decision back then.
I mean we left the door open for DB to go also and we still don't have an answer at 6 this is how this club moves at…"
As soon as the decision to release Lomax was agreed to that had to be the #1 decision back then.
I mean we left the door open for DB to go also and we still don't have an answer at 6 this is how this club moves at…"
"Cleary is superior to every half in the comp just saying.
What is funny is how all our fans were on there knees praising the coach for style of play and yet now we are back to the bash athon and aren't 1 built to play that way 2 are getting…"
What is funny is how all our fans were on there knees praising the coach for style of play and yet now we are back to the bash athon and aren't 1 built to play that way 2 are getting…"
"You know why the ruck was slow because of our lack of physicality in the middle of the park.If we ran harder like they were there getting the accendency and the officials can see that.This is the issue when your built for finesse and you play sides…"
"Our errors and when we made them was the reason we lost. When you have a ref that loves a set restart (some random for both sides) you are always going to fatigue when you hand over possession so easily."
Replies
I don't think there's much wrong with this to be honest. He can stay at the Roosters, be a premiership contender, or chase some extra dollars and be scrapping to be in the 8. We'd be talking about similar scenarios for the likes of Reed and Papa for us. They'd probably take a little less if it means they're getting to challenge for a comp rather than scrape into the 8.
Not everything is a conspiracy.
That's where I'm coming from also Brissy.
Because whilst those numbers sound correct I'll bet dollars to donuts that the numbers the NRL have are very different. This is why the NRL needs to publish player wages including registered TPA's. Only when the world can see that Tedesco is actually on the cap for only $600k (hypothetically) can we begin to fix the very obvious inequities in the system.
Hang on, I've never said not to publish player salaries, on the contrary I'm all for it, because there is precedent for salaries to be published. IMS, under ASIC regs, the five highest paid executives of any publicly listed company must have their salaries published for shareholder knowledge.
This principle also applies to pro athletes.
Nup, not moi
It must've been Super objecting to salaries being published. However I thought until now it was Brett that'd previously objected to it too Brissy on older threads.
Add to that list for 2022 Paul MOMIROVSKI from the Penrith Panthers premiership winning team.
It's just naive to believe the Roosters are actually paying him less.
He is being paid somewhere, somehow. No money will be left on the table.
It truly is a farce. There's just no way a player stays for unders that severe. It's being made up in other ways. Other ways that are undeclared to the NRL.
"soo 100k on this hole Joey, I am a shit golfer, so i may lose"
Nick to Joey
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next