If the NRL can't see there's a problem with this shit, then the same top clubs will continually stay strong.
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Hey HOE,
I have a question.
So, Daz & a few others attacked Muttman with very personal attacks a few weeks back, he has since left the site which is a massive loss.
For some reason, those attacks from Daz, Bourban Man and others seemed to slip…"
I have a question.
So, Daz & a few others attacked Muttman with very personal attacks a few weeks back, he has since left the site which is a massive loss.
For some reason, those attacks from Daz, Bourban Man and others seemed to slip…"
"Admins, Why can't we reply to Averillo blog? What bad will it do the forum of the Eels executives and R&R team if Eels fans are venting their frustrations about the recruitment which unfortunately are contributing to the bad results in the field.…"
"At the same time he still has a percentage to meet in terms of how much the cap needs to be spent whether he likes it or not.
So if it is like "This player wants $400k and we have $900k available" well he has to spend that money anyway.
So the issue…"
So if it is like "This player wants $400k and we have $900k available" well he has to spend that money anyway.
So the issue…"
Replies
I don't think there's much wrong with this to be honest. He can stay at the Roosters, be a premiership contender, or chase some extra dollars and be scrapping to be in the 8. We'd be talking about similar scenarios for the likes of Reed and Papa for us. They'd probably take a little less if it means they're getting to challenge for a comp rather than scrape into the 8.
Not everything is a conspiracy.
That's where I'm coming from also Brissy.
Because whilst those numbers sound correct I'll bet dollars to donuts that the numbers the NRL have are very different. This is why the NRL needs to publish player wages including registered TPA's. Only when the world can see that Tedesco is actually on the cap for only $600k (hypothetically) can we begin to fix the very obvious inequities in the system.
Hang on, I've never said not to publish player salaries, on the contrary I'm all for it, because there is precedent for salaries to be published. IMS, under ASIC regs, the five highest paid executives of any publicly listed company must have their salaries published for shareholder knowledge.
This principle also applies to pro athletes.
Nup, not moi
It must've been Super objecting to salaries being published. However I thought until now it was Brett that'd previously objected to it too Brissy on older threads.
Add to that list for 2022 Paul MOMIROVSKI from the Penrith Panthers premiership winning team.
It's just naive to believe the Roosters are actually paying him less.
He is being paid somewhere, somehow. No money will be left on the table.
It truly is a farce. There's just no way a player stays for unders that severe. It's being made up in other ways. Other ways that are undeclared to the NRL.
"soo 100k on this hole Joey, I am a shit golfer, so i may lose"
Nick to Joey
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next