If the NRL can't see there's a problem with this shit, then the same top clubs will continually stay strong.
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Well a mate of mine works for a mob that applies and fixes gym equipment. He goes to certain COE for teams. He didn't go to Parra but outside of Kellyville in September during finals.
He said he saw the trainer and up to 10 Eels players in there…"
He said he saw the trainer and up to 10 Eels players in there…"
"Brown and lomax replaced by debalin and pezet . If the signings put in all games we will be better off"
"First off I always look foward to a new season.
A bit of trepidation is there but I think our improvement will focus around the players we do have improving in the attack and defensive systems introduced last season.Our success will also be based…"
A bit of trepidation is there but I think our improvement will focus around the players we do have improving in the attack and defensive systems introduced last season.Our success will also be based…"
"Especially when your pathways are looking so promising. These under 21s all played reserve grade last year:
Nanva (22 games) Twidle (18) Pryke (17) Lokeni (14) Penisini (12) Papalii (9) and also played 13 NRL games Talataina (8) Funa-Iuta (7) Guymer…"
Nanva (22 games) Twidle (18) Pryke (17) Lokeni (14) Penisini (12) Papalii (9) and also played 13 NRL games Talataina (8) Funa-Iuta (7) Guymer…"
Replies
I don't think there's much wrong with this to be honest. He can stay at the Roosters, be a premiership contender, or chase some extra dollars and be scrapping to be in the 8. We'd be talking about similar scenarios for the likes of Reed and Papa for us. They'd probably take a little less if it means they're getting to challenge for a comp rather than scrape into the 8.
Not everything is a conspiracy.
That's where I'm coming from also Brissy.
Because whilst those numbers sound correct I'll bet dollars to donuts that the numbers the NRL have are very different. This is why the NRL needs to publish player wages including registered TPA's. Only when the world can see that Tedesco is actually on the cap for only $600k (hypothetically) can we begin to fix the very obvious inequities in the system.
Hang on, I've never said not to publish player salaries, on the contrary I'm all for it, because there is precedent for salaries to be published. IMS, under ASIC regs, the five highest paid executives of any publicly listed company must have their salaries published for shareholder knowledge.
This principle also applies to pro athletes.
Nup, not moi
It must've been Super objecting to salaries being published. However I thought until now it was Brett that'd previously objected to it too Brissy on older threads.
Add to that list for 2022 Paul MOMIROVSKI from the Penrith Panthers premiership winning team.
It's just naive to believe the Roosters are actually paying him less.
He is being paid somewhere, somehow. No money will be left on the table.
It truly is a farce. There's just no way a player stays for unders that severe. It's being made up in other ways. Other ways that are undeclared to the NRL.
"soo 100k on this hole Joey, I am a shit golfer, so i may lose"
Nick to Joey
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next