Replies

  • I don't think there's much wrong with this to be honest. He can stay at the Roosters, be a premiership contender, or chase some extra dollars and be scrapping to be in the 8. We'd be talking about similar scenarios for the likes of Reed and Papa for us. They'd probably take a little less if it means they're getting to challenge for a comp rather than scrape into the 8.

    Not everything is a conspiracy.

    • This reply was deleted.
      • That's where I'm coming from also Brissy.

      • Because whilst those numbers sound correct I'll bet dollars to donuts that the numbers the NRL have are very different. This is why the NRL needs to publish player wages including registered TPA's. Only when the world can see that Tedesco is actually on the cap for only $600k (hypothetically) can we begin to fix the very obvious inequities in the system. 

        • This reply was deleted.
          • Hang on, I've never said not to publish player salaries, on the contrary I'm all for it, because there is precedent for salaries to be published. IMS, under ASIC regs, the five highest paid executives of any publicly listed company must have their salaries published for shareholder knowledge. 
            This principle also applies to pro athletes. 

            • This reply was deleted.
              • Nup, not moi

              • It must've been Super objecting to salaries being published. However I thought until now it was Brett that'd previously objected to it too Brissy on older threads. 

      • Add to that list for 2022 Paul MOMIROVSKI from the Penrith Panthers premiership winning team.

    • It's just naive to believe the Roosters are actually paying him less.

      He is being paid somewhere, somehow. No money will be left on the table.

  • It truly is a farce. There's just no way a player stays for unders that severe. It's being made up in other ways. Other ways that are undeclared to the NRL. 

    • "soo 100k on this hole Joey, I am a shit golfer, so i may lose"

      Nick to Joey

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Flow Basket replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"I know it's money. Why do  our good players choose money not premierships the latest news said we're a decent outfit. Do we have any players who arnt controlled by there manager's. I hope lomax is not allowed back it ruins the game .   
Look at the…"
26 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"Ryles hasn't really done much wrong that i can see, and the huge cultural change he has introduced is awesome to see."
36 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"Exactly no rush, someone will come knocking. Best part is we have $700k waiting to be spent on an exceptional player and the rights to Zac's NRL career for the 3 years."
37 minutes ago
Flow Basket replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
" If it's total money it's all over. Is everyone here at peak or are some choosing life balance "
42 minutes ago
More…