If the NRL can't see there's a problem with this shit, then the same top clubs will continually stay strong.
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"You are missing my point, until we get better at identifying talent and then developing it it doesn't matter how far and wide we cast our net. It actually works against you when you have too many players as it costs money to have these players in…"
"Dad loved Glover. Quality Winger before moving to Penrith. Loved him and Graeme Atkins on the Wings in the 80's.
Of course Guru but loved them as well.
It says they will honor Glover on Monday, knowing Ryles and how much he values the history of the…"
Of course Guru but loved them as well.
It says they will honor Glover on Monday, knowing Ryles and how much he values the history of the…"
Former Parramatta Eels winger Neville “Nifty” Glover has died aged 70. He played 121 games for Parramatta and 13 for Penrith between 1975–1983, scoring 59 tries, and represented both NSW and Australia in 1978. Glover was a highly regarded winger…
"So why aren't we copying them we have the capacity watch what they do on video you've got JR whose come out of the Melbourne and Rooster systems who would have diagnosed what is effective and what's not.
Why do these teams get away with it and again…"
Why do these teams get away with it and again…"
Replies
I don't think there's much wrong with this to be honest. He can stay at the Roosters, be a premiership contender, or chase some extra dollars and be scrapping to be in the 8. We'd be talking about similar scenarios for the likes of Reed and Papa for us. They'd probably take a little less if it means they're getting to challenge for a comp rather than scrape into the 8.
Not everything is a conspiracy.
That's where I'm coming from also Brissy.
Because whilst those numbers sound correct I'll bet dollars to donuts that the numbers the NRL have are very different. This is why the NRL needs to publish player wages including registered TPA's. Only when the world can see that Tedesco is actually on the cap for only $600k (hypothetically) can we begin to fix the very obvious inequities in the system.
Hang on, I've never said not to publish player salaries, on the contrary I'm all for it, because there is precedent for salaries to be published. IMS, under ASIC regs, the five highest paid executives of any publicly listed company must have their salaries published for shareholder knowledge.
This principle also applies to pro athletes.
Nup, not moi
It must've been Super objecting to salaries being published. However I thought until now it was Brett that'd previously objected to it too Brissy on older threads.
Add to that list for 2022 Paul MOMIROVSKI from the Penrith Panthers premiership winning team.
It's just naive to believe the Roosters are actually paying him less.
He is being paid somewhere, somehow. No money will be left on the table.
It truly is a farce. There's just no way a player stays for unders that severe. It's being made up in other ways. Other ways that are undeclared to the NRL.
"soo 100k on this hole Joey, I am a shit golfer, so i may lose"
Nick to Joey
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next