Replies

  • I don't think there's much wrong with this to be honest. He can stay at the Roosters, be a premiership contender, or chase some extra dollars and be scrapping to be in the 8. We'd be talking about similar scenarios for the likes of Reed and Papa for us. They'd probably take a little less if it means they're getting to challenge for a comp rather than scrape into the 8.

    Not everything is a conspiracy.

    • This reply was deleted.
      • That's where I'm coming from also Brissy.

      • Because whilst those numbers sound correct I'll bet dollars to donuts that the numbers the NRL have are very different. This is why the NRL needs to publish player wages including registered TPA's. Only when the world can see that Tedesco is actually on the cap for only $600k (hypothetically) can we begin to fix the very obvious inequities in the system. 

        • This reply was deleted.
          • Hang on, I've never said not to publish player salaries, on the contrary I'm all for it, because there is precedent for salaries to be published. IMS, under ASIC regs, the five highest paid executives of any publicly listed company must have their salaries published for shareholder knowledge. 
            This principle also applies to pro athletes. 

            • This reply was deleted.
              • Nup, not moi

              • It must've been Super objecting to salaries being published. However I thought until now it was Brett that'd previously objected to it too Brissy on older threads. 

      • Add to that list for 2022 Paul MOMIROVSKI from the Penrith Panthers premiership winning team.

    • It's just naive to believe the Roosters are actually paying him less.

      He is being paid somewhere, somehow. No money will be left on the table.

  • It truly is a farce. There's just no way a player stays for unders that severe. It's being made up in other ways. Other ways that are undeclared to the NRL. 

    • "soo 100k on this hole Joey, I am a shit golfer, so i may lose"

      Nick to Joey

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Jimeoin replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"Does anyone else think that PVL looks like the most dodgy used car salesman you could ever meet?
Apart from him getting games over the line during Covid and becoming a hero as a result, he appears as a shonky character and certainly someone I…"
17 minutes ago
TolEllts replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"Just so casual calling the game regulator to 'regulate' the Eels to their favor so they can get what they want. Isn't this attitude so demeaning for the Eels treating the organisation as a low life club that they can do whatever they want. Good for…"
24 minutes ago
Nitram replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"Um excuse me, how is this 'Melbourne Storm asked the NRL to "apply the blow torch" to Parramatta to release Zac Lomax' not the biggest story in nrl history? Is this fairdinkum? This is shocking stuff. Why is the melbourne storm ceo still in his…"
1 hour ago
Hell On Eels replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"Eelovution, Randy, That's a great idea mate.
Super is a member of the Supporters Group Alliance that meet with club bi-monthly. I'm not part of it.
However,  I have a suggestion. Let's set up a blog and I will ask Jim Sarantinos and maybe our…"
2 hours ago
More…