Replies

  • I don't think there's much wrong with this to be honest. He can stay at the Roosters, be a premiership contender, or chase some extra dollars and be scrapping to be in the 8. We'd be talking about similar scenarios for the likes of Reed and Papa for us. They'd probably take a little less if it means they're getting to challenge for a comp rather than scrape into the 8.

    Not everything is a conspiracy.

    • This reply was deleted.
      • That's where I'm coming from also Brissy.

      • Because whilst those numbers sound correct I'll bet dollars to donuts that the numbers the NRL have are very different. This is why the NRL needs to publish player wages including registered TPA's. Only when the world can see that Tedesco is actually on the cap for only $600k (hypothetically) can we begin to fix the very obvious inequities in the system. 

        • This reply was deleted.
          • Hang on, I've never said not to publish player salaries, on the contrary I'm all for it, because there is precedent for salaries to be published. IMS, under ASIC regs, the five highest paid executives of any publicly listed company must have their salaries published for shareholder knowledge. 
            This principle also applies to pro athletes. 

            • This reply was deleted.
              • Nup, not moi

              • It must've been Super objecting to salaries being published. However I thought until now it was Brett that'd previously objected to it too Brissy on older threads. 

      • Add to that list for 2022 Paul MOMIROVSKI from the Penrith Panthers premiership winning team.

    • It's just naive to believe the Roosters are actually paying him less.

      He is being paid somewhere, somehow. No money will be left on the table.

  • It truly is a farce. There's just no way a player stays for unders that severe. It's being made up in other ways. Other ways that are undeclared to the NRL. 

    • "soo 100k on this hole Joey, I am a shit golfer, so i may lose"

      Nick to Joey

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R10 v Cowboys: The Townsville Graveyard
"Thanks, brother.
Hopefully, history doesn't re-write another chapter from this century's book. Your scoreline aligns with that.
If we fight for the fourth-straight week, it's a good sign. We could also end up flatter and fatigued earlier if they get…"
9 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Poppa's discussion Poppa's Corner: SCAPEGOATS..... A funny thing, you can say it with a cry in your voice!......The Parra Lament
"I think he's a stop gap the fact he's bounced around a few clubs gives me no confidence he's the long term answer here.To be honest with you the way the positions been handled I'm finding it hard to trust any decision around the position.I just…"
13 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R10 v Cowboys: The Townsville Graveyard
"Cowboys by plenty. Gee, not much in terms of Rugby League to get excited about this year. Forty years since last premiership is a looooong drought. Hopefully they'll win another "
29 minutes ago
Nightmare Off-Season replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R10 v Cowboys: The Townsville Graveyard
"Nice write-up, HOE.
Geez, we really don't like Townsville.
Feel we might be in trouble in this one with Cowboys in form & running high on JT emotion.
Vice Captain Drinkwater in SuperCoach?
Cowboys 40 - Eels 16"
34 minutes ago
More…