Replies

  • I don't think there's much wrong with this to be honest. He can stay at the Roosters, be a premiership contender, or chase some extra dollars and be scrapping to be in the 8. We'd be talking about similar scenarios for the likes of Reed and Papa for us. They'd probably take a little less if it means they're getting to challenge for a comp rather than scrape into the 8.

    Not everything is a conspiracy.

    • This reply was deleted.
      • That's where I'm coming from also Brissy.

      • Because whilst those numbers sound correct I'll bet dollars to donuts that the numbers the NRL have are very different. This is why the NRL needs to publish player wages including registered TPA's. Only when the world can see that Tedesco is actually on the cap for only $600k (hypothetically) can we begin to fix the very obvious inequities in the system. 

        • This reply was deleted.
          • Hang on, I've never said not to publish player salaries, on the contrary I'm all for it, because there is precedent for salaries to be published. IMS, under ASIC regs, the five highest paid executives of any publicly listed company must have their salaries published for shareholder knowledge. 
            This principle also applies to pro athletes. 

            • This reply was deleted.
              • Nup, not moi

              • It must've been Super objecting to salaries being published. However I thought until now it was Brett that'd previously objected to it too Brissy on older threads. 

      • Add to that list for 2022 Paul MOMIROVSKI from the Penrith Panthers premiership winning team.

    • It's just naive to believe the Roosters are actually paying him less.

      He is being paid somewhere, somehow. No money will be left on the table.

  • It truly is a farce. There's just no way a player stays for unders that severe. It's being made up in other ways. Other ways that are undeclared to the NRL. 

    • "soo 100k on this hole Joey, I am a shit golfer, so i may lose"

      Nick to Joey

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Randy Handlinger replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Why Academics Suck
"Let me be clear. There is no-one here like Tes. We have only macey and Her Majesty representing the ladies. Tes is not gonna get slapped by me, and if folks wanna play too rough with her, well, I'll be running Defence gor her...so bring a helmet"
12 seconds ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Johnny Suede's discussion SMH Report: Storm, Raiders & Perth Allegedly All Interested In Signing Lomax
"Perth could give us an assurance that they would not target our players for 27...but we know what that assurance would be worth....but they will probably just offer us Ray Stone back.
 "
19 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Johnny Suede's discussion SMH Report: Storm, Raiders & Perth Allegedly All Interested In Signing Lomax
"Fuck Yeah Mr Turner...he didn't have to come out in the media and loudly state that but he did...“That is absolute bullshit" is pretty unequivocal. "That's a lie" pins it right on their chest.
This is a righteous fight with an outcome that will…"
24 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Johnny Suede's discussion SMH Report: Storm, Raiders & Perth Allegedly All Interested In Signing Lomax
"To me, it reads like an attempt by Team Lomax to frame us as unreasonable and punitive: 'We offered Parra multiple options, but instead of engaging or compromising, they chose to litigate.'
It could backfire. I wonder if our counsel will call these…"
45 minutes ago
More…