Replies

  • I don't think there's much wrong with this to be honest. He can stay at the Roosters, be a premiership contender, or chase some extra dollars and be scrapping to be in the 8. We'd be talking about similar scenarios for the likes of Reed and Papa for us. They'd probably take a little less if it means they're getting to challenge for a comp rather than scrape into the 8.

    Not everything is a conspiracy.

    • This reply was deleted.
      • That's where I'm coming from also Brissy.

      • Because whilst those numbers sound correct I'll bet dollars to donuts that the numbers the NRL have are very different. This is why the NRL needs to publish player wages including registered TPA's. Only when the world can see that Tedesco is actually on the cap for only $600k (hypothetically) can we begin to fix the very obvious inequities in the system. 

        • This reply was deleted.
          • Hang on, I've never said not to publish player salaries, on the contrary I'm all for it, because there is precedent for salaries to be published. IMS, under ASIC regs, the five highest paid executives of any publicly listed company must have their salaries published for shareholder knowledge. 
            This principle also applies to pro athletes. 

            • This reply was deleted.
              • Nup, not moi

              • It must've been Super objecting to salaries being published. However I thought until now it was Brett that'd previously objected to it too Brissy on older threads. 

      • Add to that list for 2022 Paul MOMIROVSKI from the Penrith Panthers premiership winning team.

    • It's just naive to believe the Roosters are actually paying him less.

      He is being paid somewhere, somehow. No money will be left on the table.

  • It truly is a farce. There's just no way a player stays for unders that severe. It's being made up in other ways. Other ways that are undeclared to the NRL. 

    • "soo 100k on this hole Joey, I am a shit golfer, so i may lose"

      Nick to Joey

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

DYNASTY.LOADING replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion To many rumours
"I reckon that's it. Lost in translation/Chinese whispers, probably signing tomorrow, not announcing, and that's bring cooling off to just about Nov 1.
Atleast, that's a possible explanation.
I do like the idea of announcing multiple signings in one…"
39 minutes ago
Zip zip replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion NRL THREATEN 10-YEAR BAN FOR R360 DEFECTORS
"None of us are lawyers. From what it reads, it's a massive deterrent for anyone thinking of R360. Let's be honest, this R360 is doing nothing for grass roots rugby development. It's all about lining the pockets of the backers. I am actually…"
1 hour ago
Michael W. replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion NRL THREATEN 10-YEAR BAN FOR R360 DEFECTORS
"They don't want players breaking contracts mid contract, but the NRL is fine with clubs offloading players mid contract. "
1 hour ago
Kurupt - Porn Addict, But I'm In Control replied to EA's discussion Bailey Simonsson To Remain At The Eels
"How bout now?"
1 hour ago
More…