If the NRL can't see there's a problem with this shit, then the same top clubs will continually stay strong.
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Guess what? Every team tries to manipulate rules to their advantage. If a team is better at it than others then good on them, every team does it. Doesn't mean the sole reason they are winning.
Can you please, please answer me this question. Is the…"
Can you please, please answer me this question. Is the…"
"A very good read, once again.
Some take aways for me.
i. I can now see why the NRL wanted to change the kick off rule giving the defending team the right to kick off or receive after a try against them. If the game is to stay as is. This rule is a…"
Some take aways for me.
i. I can now see why the NRL wanted to change the kick off rule giving the defending team the right to kick off or receive after a try against them. If the game is to stay as is. This rule is a…"
"Not always the penalty counts! It depends where exactly the penalty was given, the amount of set restarts and what tackle it's given on, where on the field. Like I said Penrith are experts at it and are able to manipulate the referees exactly when…"
"Yeah worked for the Warriors winning 10-1 penalty count.....oh wait no they lost.
Well I mean Dragons won 10-5 coun....oh they lost too.
Difference is Penrith are just that good and they had on penalty more on Friday night."
Well I mean Dragons won 10-5 coun....oh they lost too.
Difference is Penrith are just that good and they had on penalty more on Friday night."
Replies
I don't think there's much wrong with this to be honest. He can stay at the Roosters, be a premiership contender, or chase some extra dollars and be scrapping to be in the 8. We'd be talking about similar scenarios for the likes of Reed and Papa for us. They'd probably take a little less if it means they're getting to challenge for a comp rather than scrape into the 8.
Not everything is a conspiracy.
That's where I'm coming from also Brissy.
Because whilst those numbers sound correct I'll bet dollars to donuts that the numbers the NRL have are very different. This is why the NRL needs to publish player wages including registered TPA's. Only when the world can see that Tedesco is actually on the cap for only $600k (hypothetically) can we begin to fix the very obvious inequities in the system.
Hang on, I've never said not to publish player salaries, on the contrary I'm all for it, because there is precedent for salaries to be published. IMS, under ASIC regs, the five highest paid executives of any publicly listed company must have their salaries published for shareholder knowledge.
This principle also applies to pro athletes.
Nup, not moi
It must've been Super objecting to salaries being published. However I thought until now it was Brett that'd previously objected to it too Brissy on older threads.
Add to that list for 2022 Paul MOMIROVSKI from the Penrith Panthers premiership winning team.
It's just naive to believe the Roosters are actually paying him less.
He is being paid somewhere, somehow. No money will be left on the table.
It truly is a farce. There's just no way a player stays for unders that severe. It's being made up in other ways. Other ways that are undeclared to the NRL.
"soo 100k on this hole Joey, I am a shit golfer, so i may lose"
Nick to Joey
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next