Replies

  • I don't think there's much wrong with this to be honest. He can stay at the Roosters, be a premiership contender, or chase some extra dollars and be scrapping to be in the 8. We'd be talking about similar scenarios for the likes of Reed and Papa for us. They'd probably take a little less if it means they're getting to challenge for a comp rather than scrape into the 8.

    Not everything is a conspiracy.

    • This reply was deleted.
      • That's where I'm coming from also Brissy.

      • Because whilst those numbers sound correct I'll bet dollars to donuts that the numbers the NRL have are very different. This is why the NRL needs to publish player wages including registered TPA's. Only when the world can see that Tedesco is actually on the cap for only $600k (hypothetically) can we begin to fix the very obvious inequities in the system. 

        • This reply was deleted.
          • Hang on, I've never said not to publish player salaries, on the contrary I'm all for it, because there is precedent for salaries to be published. IMS, under ASIC regs, the five highest paid executives of any publicly listed company must have their salaries published for shareholder knowledge. 
            This principle also applies to pro athletes. 

            • This reply was deleted.
              • Nup, not moi

              • It must've been Super objecting to salaries being published. However I thought until now it was Brett that'd previously objected to it too Brissy on older threads. 

      • Add to that list for 2022 Paul MOMIROVSKI from the Penrith Panthers premiership winning team.

    • It's just naive to believe the Roosters are actually paying him less.

      He is being paid somewhere, somehow. No money will be left on the table.

  • It truly is a farce. There's just no way a player stays for unders that severe. It's being made up in other ways. Other ways that are undeclared to the NRL. 

    • "soo 100k on this hole Joey, I am a shit golfer, so i may lose"

      Nick to Joey

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

macybrown replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Ashley Klein's $400K gambling problem
"Honestly unbelievable the nrl would allow him to continue.
Doubt vmuch he is the only one. 
old Sandow was prob right when he questioned the refs actions and him being dodgy too back years ago."
9 minutes ago
Axel replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Ashley Klein's $400K gambling problem
"I think there's more to this story than meets the eye. Why is this being revealed now and what's the motivation behind it? why did the NRL sweep it under the carper for the last 4 years?
With Abdo moving out, I wonder if there's a move to start…"
10 minutes ago
Frankie Fong replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Ashley Klein's $400K gambling problem
"Do you really think the NRL would come out and tell the truth ? The public need to see documented evidence to believe he was betting on the races . "
12 minutes ago
Nightmare Off-Season replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion The Ticking Time Bomb
"Excellent posts, Cap.
Very interesting to see you come in from another angle with so many great points for discussion.
'I'm actually not sure that we have a ticking time bomb any more. I think we did...and it went off when Dylan Brown walked.' - Do…"
16 minutes ago
More…