If the NRL can't see there's a problem with this shit, then the same top clubs will continually stay strong.
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"You know what Mitchy, I cannot even argue that, BA for all his faults in coaching would not have been a good listener, as I might add were not the Parra people who sent him away?.... but that is a hindsight comment from me, because I was not there,…"
"No the shame is PG that people that want to intellectualise a problem can be seen to be able to do so by wanting the team (read club)to do better and be successful, just like you do. Accepting that is a starting point because we all have that in…"
"I'm leaning towards keeping him, but I can see us signing a back up half whether Volk stays or goes. I think the club would go into next year with Moses, Talataina, +1, +1. I think with the 6 man bench Papalii might be kept as 18th man or cup…"
"Well you maybe right Mongo, but can Anasta continue to be a player manager, if he becomes a CEO or Head of Football for Parra.....nice to have's are usually just that, I saw Sharon Stone as a nice to have, but I am sure I would have lost interest if…"
Replies
I don't think there's much wrong with this to be honest. He can stay at the Roosters, be a premiership contender, or chase some extra dollars and be scrapping to be in the 8. We'd be talking about similar scenarios for the likes of Reed and Papa for us. They'd probably take a little less if it means they're getting to challenge for a comp rather than scrape into the 8.
Not everything is a conspiracy.
That's where I'm coming from also Brissy.
Because whilst those numbers sound correct I'll bet dollars to donuts that the numbers the NRL have are very different. This is why the NRL needs to publish player wages including registered TPA's. Only when the world can see that Tedesco is actually on the cap for only $600k (hypothetically) can we begin to fix the very obvious inequities in the system.
Hang on, I've never said not to publish player salaries, on the contrary I'm all for it, because there is precedent for salaries to be published. IMS, under ASIC regs, the five highest paid executives of any publicly listed company must have their salaries published for shareholder knowledge.
This principle also applies to pro athletes.
Nup, not moi
It must've been Super objecting to salaries being published. However I thought until now it was Brett that'd previously objected to it too Brissy on older threads.
Add to that list for 2022 Paul MOMIROVSKI from the Penrith Panthers premiership winning team.
It's just naive to believe the Roosters are actually paying him less.
He is being paid somewhere, somehow. No money will be left on the table.
It truly is a farce. There's just no way a player stays for unders that severe. It's being made up in other ways. Other ways that are undeclared to the NRL.
"soo 100k on this hole Joey, I am a shit golfer, so i may lose"
Nick to Joey
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next