Replies

  • I don't think there's much wrong with this to be honest. He can stay at the Roosters, be a premiership contender, or chase some extra dollars and be scrapping to be in the 8. We'd be talking about similar scenarios for the likes of Reed and Papa for us. They'd probably take a little less if it means they're getting to challenge for a comp rather than scrape into the 8.

    Not everything is a conspiracy.

    • This reply was deleted.
      • That's where I'm coming from also Brissy.

      • Because whilst those numbers sound correct I'll bet dollars to donuts that the numbers the NRL have are very different. This is why the NRL needs to publish player wages including registered TPA's. Only when the world can see that Tedesco is actually on the cap for only $600k (hypothetically) can we begin to fix the very obvious inequities in the system. 

        • This reply was deleted.
          • Hang on, I've never said not to publish player salaries, on the contrary I'm all for it, because there is precedent for salaries to be published. IMS, under ASIC regs, the five highest paid executives of any publicly listed company must have their salaries published for shareholder knowledge. 
            This principle also applies to pro athletes. 

            • This reply was deleted.
              • Nup, not moi

              • It must've been Super objecting to salaries being published. However I thought until now it was Brett that'd previously objected to it too Brissy on older threads. 

      • Add to that list for 2022 Paul MOMIROVSKI from the Penrith Panthers premiership winning team.

    • It's just naive to believe the Roosters are actually paying him less.

      He is being paid somewhere, somehow. No money will be left on the table.

  • It truly is a farce. There's just no way a player stays for unders that severe. It's being made up in other ways. Other ways that are undeclared to the NRL. 

    • "soo 100k on this hole Joey, I am a shit golfer, so i may lose"

      Nick to Joey

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

JC replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"Assistant coaches, yes he should have a say but training staff should be hired by the head of football.
Tell me,  what responsibility does the head of football have?, according to some on here he isn't responsible for recruitment or retention,  not…"
4 minutes ago
The Badger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion NSW Cup blog - Watch live 12:35
"Thanks EA. I guess we go with whoever is the best fit at the time."
8 minutes ago
EA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion NSW Cup blog - Watch live 12:35
"Nah I don't rate him. Fletcher is injured which is also why cause would be our normal Flegg 7"
11 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"LB everything under the football department in the end is O'neill's responsibility.  Ryles has to go through O'neill' before anything gets done.  
The state of the club now with O'neill at the helm as long as he has been,  means he should be axed…"
14 minutes ago
More…