JAC still on our radar

JAC is still on EELS radar i hear. We met with his management last week again. Gus needs to approve

Dont be surprised he is an eel 2024

stuff goin on in the background

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 1
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I wonder if Fogarty resigning till 2025 has an impact on whether Sanders wants to stay. This signing shows that Sanders will be only a back up at Raiders or eels till end of 2025 as a minimum. Personally, if I was Sanders Idk why the fuck he should leave the eels. Ricky has not developed a top half back at that club or any club. Wighton is overated as a 5/8. Look how well Moses and DB has developed at the eels. Barret is here who IMO was a major contributer to the growth of Luai and Cleary. Sanders should stay at eels till the end of 2025 and than asssess his options from there.

    • I would still like to see how brown went at fullback, Gutho ctw, sanders 5/8 at some point 

  • Hope not, I'd rather have Sivo, Sivo, Sivo and Dumpstar, Dumpstar, Dumpstar. JAC must have issues if both Storm and Dogs want to offload him.

    • JAC chose to come back to Sydney that's why he left Melbourne, money also.

    • That's my thoughts too Cumberland 

  • Sorry but who is JAC

    • No need to apologize mate.

      Josh Addo-Carr, winger for the Bulldogs. 

      Nicknamed the Fox.

      Played for Storm, Nsw and Australia.

  • Dogs need to offload JAC to sign Luai 

  • Still a no for me; he's not what we need in terms of ego. If they don't want him then there's reason here

    • Ego is not a dirty word. Don't believe what you've seen or heard.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Nitram replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kemp: Eels vs Storm R1 refereeing was "really, really bad...disgraceful"
"Obviously the ref either;
A) failured and cant do his job, or
B) was asked to apply the blow torch (hahah no chance, go back to A).
BUT, I watched the manly/canberra game and the ref was killing the raiders as well (at the start). The difference was…"
3 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Mark O'neill out - Shane Richardson in
"Yes he is an executive director. Not elected from the board, he could be replaced at any time, i.e not an elected director."
4 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Mark O'neill out - Shane Richardson in
"Hey I have some big news  - the Fox will be named against the Broncos 
Put that in ya pipe and smoke 🚬  it"
6 minutes ago
LB replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kemp: Eels vs Storm R1 refereeing was "really, really bad...disgraceful"
"It adds it more up to interpretation of the referee as opposed to actual penalties that they would be a bit more hesitant to blow. If ref is 50/50 he would probably go 6 again. If there was no 6 again he is a bit more cautious to avoid the…"
7 minutes ago
More…