JAC still on our radar

JAC is still on EELS radar i hear. We met with his management last week again. Gus needs to approve

Dont be surprised he is an eel 2024

stuff goin on in the background

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 1
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Source? Every post here without a source should be ignored.

    • All due respect to your comment, how can we name a source on an open forum that media, players, club officials read?

      i have no problem if u choose to ignore. Many will.. 

       

      • You don't need to drop names, but at least somewhat explain how you heard of this?

        For example, "from a member within the club" or "from associate with a current player". Something! Otherwise, it's just waffle.

        • Id just ignore it if you feel that way PB1

  • You say Gus needs to approve, have the Dogs even given JAC permission to negotiate?

    • i think Gus has said to his manager, if you can discreetly find a good offer, put it to us and go from there

  • J A C would be a disruptive unit,anyone that has his mouth shut tight when the National anthem is being sung does not need to be any where near our club 

    • That's a beat up by the media. I don't sing the anthem because I don't really sing anything. I love my country.

    • Is he that much of a nuisance? If you keep a lid on him he is fine. He has not been terrific off-field but not that bad compared to so many others. I would argue Corey Norman did worse here than JAC has done in his career.

      •  agree, i dont think JAC is an issue. Think media made it worse, same like Latrell

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Michael W. replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"I like the signing of Kelly, it gives our outside backs, Russell and Simmonson a bit of competition. Most of the narrative around Kelly's signing has been about his terrible defence. I watched four Titans games from this year, his defence is not as…"
19 minutes ago
Michael W. replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"It's a footy forum, and that should be it. We've lost quite a few good posters the last few years, I don't know whether it's because of politics, religion, racism, language or we have lost them because of the lack of success the club has had for…"
43 minutes ago
Perpetual Motion replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"I read a few eels forums and there is always lots of infighting. Seperating the politics is a good idea as it is toxic and devisive. I actually think think the quality of this site has improved somewhat in the last year or so. "
1 hour ago
GOLDEEL replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"I'm not sure when this site started but I've been on here from the early days and while I don't comment or post much I always check in to read everyone's opinions if they are good or bad. In all my time I've been here HOE I can say I enjoyed reading…"
2 hours ago
More…