It’s a no from the red bandana

Peter Fitzsimmons has written a lengthy piece on Fox today 

sorry for screenshot 

waiting for wiz and his " would never listen to the raging lefty " comment 

anyway thought it interesting and prob pretty accurate 31267687661?profile=RESIZE_710x

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Not what I expected him to say. This is an opportunity for the club to make some real change in this area. They can't do that if they walk away from harsh realities of life.

    • Yeh me too 

      I was surprised 

  • He makes some reasonable points in there, especially about the involvement of alcohol and gambling in the game, both of which generate a lot of harm in the community, but he also misses a key point when implying JAC hasn't done anything bad. Imagine driving your car past a primary school at 3pm doing 200km/h, but you don't kill anyone, so it's no biggy. This is where we are with JAC, he hasn't harmed anyone, but it's well established that driving while impaired significantly affects your ability to drive safely. If he keeps getting in a car like this, he's sooner or later the next Ezra Mam, or worse, he kills someone.

    • But the charge is not driving while impaired.  Its driving with illicit subtance in saliva.  That illicit substance could have been taken 2-3 days prior.  

      Im not necessarily supporting JAC just supplying a bit of info.

      • To be fair, some of that is speculation. I'm not claiming you are wrong, you may well be right, but it's also possible he took it 1 hour before getting in the car.

  • Fitzsimmons penned this without his red bandana on.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Michael W. replied to CarloEEL2's discussion It’s a no from the red bandana
"Fitzsimmons penned this without his red bandana on."
6 minutes ago
MeelK replied to CarloEEL2's discussion It’s a no from the red bandana
"To be fair, some of that is speculation. I'm not claiming you are wrong, you may well be right, but it's also possible he took it 1 hour before getting in the car."
19 minutes ago
Eels tragic replied to CarloEEL2's discussion It’s a no from the red bandana
"But the charge is not driving while impaired.  Its driving with illicit subtance in saliva.  That illicit substance could have been taken 2-3 days prior.  
Im not necessarily supporting JAC just supplying a bit of info."
22 minutes ago
MeelK replied to CarloEEL2's discussion It’s a no from the red bandana
"He makes some reasonable points in there, especially about the involvement of alcohol and gambling in the game, both of which generate a lot of harm in the community, but he also misses a key point when implying JAC hasn't done anything bad. Imagine…"
36 minutes ago
More…