If he goes, it must be before June 30

If Gutherson decides to leave and go back to the silver tails and settle to play out of position for a club that didn't want him so be it. 

If this happens he must move before June 30.  Move Fergo to 1 and bring in Gennings to the wing. 

Would we lose that much? Huh based on our results not that much.

We would save money and get a DWZ or someone else. 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • So disruptive 

    I could not have fathomed this fiasco ( should it occur) to destabilise our season . Truly dissapointing 

    • Carls i hate to say it but its all your fault and you know it.

      Every player that you direct sexual energy to's career starts going down the tube at the club.

      Look at poor Fozzy and Will Smith, poor buggers.

      • Snake 

        my sexual energy is powerful , I will not deny 

        but can I clarify , once again , there has been NONE directed guthos way . 

        I hate beards !!! 

        I take no responsibility here 

        • Gutho told me he grew the beard to try and deflect your sexual energy but the force was too strong, now look at him.

          • Gold 

            yes I’m a skywalker 

            • 2563313743?profile=original

              He said he is working on this look.

    • Yeah I was pissed off with Peni at the start of the season thinking that may de-rail our season, I dream of those days now.

      • Peni 

        lol

  • How about you just have some patience, wait a few days, and see what happens before you start posting “what if’s “. Ffs this is getting tedious. No more Gutherson contract blogs would be awesome! Emotions are running high here and everyone is going on like a News Limited germ. Leave it to the parasites why don’t ya?! 

    • Agree... 

      Just stating if.  I for one want him to stay, but if he does go I don't want to be at Parra Stadium with our captain being booed. 

      I would he move on

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Poppa replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Sorry. nothing I have said is from AI other than the Storm ownership structure.
I am questioning the facts of your comment HA HA WHY?  questioning that there are none just AI..... don't understand the 10 year bans (R360) Stuff in context by…"
1 minute ago
Anguillidae replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"I'm perfectly capable of analysing a situation and making up my own mind. I despise AI and have even managed to structure my own sentences in this response, without it. AMAZING! You can go on believing whatever you like I'll do exactly the same.…"
12 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Notwithstanding all the rhetoric LB and assume you are right. Would Zac believe it is in his interests to continue to persue the case legally (without Storm's involvement) as it then gives him rights to negotiate with anyone......within the NRL, the…"
12 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Same Randy, just taking action in itself is a win for me. I wish I shared your optimism in the Courts Poppa, but historical bias doesn't have me feeling too confident. We. Will. See."
21 minutes ago
More…