How heavy will Newscorp go on the Broncos story?

We can all remember how relentlsss Newscorp media (DT and Fox) were on Parra when we breached the cap and the board was a mess etc.

To me this scandal is a worse enditement on a club, but I'll be very interested to see how Fox and the DT deal with one of their own  

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

    • Chances are Brett we will never know the truth. Absolutely horrendous rumours but where there is smoke and all that. No doubt whatever is going on a lot has been totally embellished.

      All said and done we should never trust social media or what is reported in the news. Lets ask ourselves who owns the Broncos and Fox?...oh yes News Ltd. Does News Ltd want this blemish on the books ultimately impacting the share price and future investment? And what about the trolls, what is their agenda? 

      Sadly many innocent people are impacted regardless of where the truth lies.

       

      • The flip side Archie is that if the Broncos really want to get rid of him, then in News Ltd they have the perfect platform to destabilize him.

        The Broncos share price doesn't move much anyway because News owns 67% of the issued shares and so the stock is extremely illiquid. The Broncos are a cash cow, but in the News Ltd corporate universe they are small fry. I very much doubt that Rupert or Lachlan give the Broncos even the slightest thought.

    • Wouldn't be surprised that someone aligned to the Broncos management started this rumour to F him off without pay......

  • I was referring to Newscorp garbage heaped on Dan Andrews. 

    • Uncle Rupert and his miminons take every chance to disparage any one not willing to bend the knee to their brand of the free market.

  • Im surprised the broncs handling has been so poor this year, sounds like a few of them have been putting in some extra ballwork.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

iamnot replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"Fitzy had no idea how to build ongoing success, or build sucess at all. He was politically strong and connected, that was it. He ensured the club constitution was setup in a way that made it very hard to boot him out of office.
He got extremely…"
1 hour ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"That's the entire purpose of our junior development now. The entire focus is on those juniors. We have now got the largest junior investment in the competition. And that's what is partially frustrating about these discussions saying "where's our big…"
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"They were when the club was a development first that's the difference what we were then is what we are trying to get back to I suspect.
Those 09 and 22 appearances tells you all you need to no about the club they aren't consistent and until we get…"
2 hours ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Aj's discussion Why have our signings. Gone quiet 🤫
"2001? A squad built over a 5 year period culminating in one of the best NRL era teams of all time that fell at the final hurdle. The team that beat the defending premiers in the preliminary final.
2005. Again, a squad rebuilt following 2001 and a…"
2 hours ago
More…