Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Yeah of course, becasue innocent people are so often prepared to pay out big dollars to someone if there is no case.  It all depends how you chose to look at it, doesnt it Poppa.

      • In the civil case, a mediated pay out is probably the smart thing to do. It likely minimises the amount as well as avoiding a trial where the burden of proof is a lot lower than were it a criminal trial.

      • A lot of innocent people pay these civil suits in the states in fear of being found guilty and losing a huge amount.

        The court systems not always fair, they get it wrong all the time here and in the states.

        Theres no such thing as guaranteed justice.

      • ^^^^^ this.

        No direct link or anything to do with the current Newcastle Case at all Poppy.

         

    • Poppa, give it a rest, no one's going to be suing the NRL over their no-fault stand down policy given De Belin's case was thrown out by the Federal Court, giving the NRL the cover of a legal judgement and legal precedent they can stand behind.

      No one is denying JDB his living, he's being paid in full. BTW, Hayne has not been suspended by the NRL, he just hasn't been signed by a club. When he was arrested and charged he was not employed by the NRL.

  • I just read he’s over in Perth doing ‘Disciple Training’ for the evangelist church. God Bless Him.

    • He’ll need god 

  • Prediction : When Hayne is found not guilty in Newcastle court in May next year , He signs with Parramatta on a minimum wage just before the June 30 deadline.

    • I honestly can't see it happening.

    • Wont be happening, absolute last thing we need.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Coryn Hughes replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"In all essence this case is very black n white but Lomax's lawyers will be looking for avenues that will highlight different that's the key here is for us not to get drawn into the Lomax arguement but to stay on track and highlight what's been…"
53 seconds ago
Clintorian replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Not to mention all the other teams in Rugby he could be playing in."
3 hours ago
Muttman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"It's now out of the NRL's hands. If the court says the conditions of the release are valid and still stand then that is that. The NRL can't stomp all over the Eels' legal rights.  Lomax told the Eels in writing he was proceeding with the Storm…"
6 hours ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"You'd think it's in the NRL's best interest to be on Parra's side here. If they take the side of Lomax then every player contract means nothing. This is bigger than a single case- it could open up a world where players do whatever they want,…"
6 hours ago
More…