GREAT NEWS !

 For some! This year we are all the same age. We are all the same---erk!!

Take the year you were born ans add to it how old you are. The answer will be 2019!! For examle I am 86 years old and I was born in 1933. Add the to gether and the answer is 2019! For everyone! This comes from the mystical valleys of old Welsh folk lore---The Lloyds are related to these weidoes--- much to my chraing. But to be happy we have won sonething this year!! Wont the TCT fantisize about that.

If you want nore of these momentus trueths from the ilse of yore it will cost you big money---real big.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • No - depends if your birthday is earlier in the year or later in the year. For example if you were born in December you will get 2018

  • It is the same every year nothing special about this year, your year of birth plus your age equals current year.  Unless as wile said it can be different depending if your birthday is before or after.

     

  • Is this post in Welsh ?

  • Anouther robert Lloyd special

    • Sorry robert, I didn’t realise that you were 86 and I’ve taken the absolute piss out of you many times.

      My apologies as I respect my elders dearly.

  • 86! you legend

  • This reply was deleted.
    • All this time we all thought Robert was crazy but actually he is only an Eccentric old bugger.

      • There's something in that for all of us !

         

  • This blog is one of those little golden mathematical nuggets you might be lucky enough to stumble across once or twice in your lifetime. Keep up the good work bobby!

  • Welsh ancestry here also. I bet you can sing Robert. You must love Sir Harry singing this:

    .......and if that didn't bring a tear to your eye, this surely will. The great Paul Robeson with the best ever rendition of the Welsh National Anthem:

     

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

will replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"Ryles is wanting speed.
He wants fast mobile forwards and speedy backs
Howarth does tick a box for the 6 man interchange. 
A 2nd rower who can play centre could be valuable "
34 seconds ago
Longfin Eel replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"I have a feeling Melbourne will go cold on this now that we have called their bluff. Not sure where that leaves the situation. It's unfathomable what Schifcofske has done here. What's more baffling is that the media seems to have left him alone. "
1 minute ago
Eel for life replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels Dig In on Player Release, Demand Fair Value in Any Deal
"Totally support the club and the way they've handled things in this scenario. We have to give them credit where credit is due. We're quick to critisise when they get something wrong, so we should be quick to give them credit when they do something…"
9 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"One of the issues with Howarth for Lomax is that if we set aside that it's not an appropriate value exchange (all remarks about rep status etc) we are still left with an unknown. Specifically, what does Ryles want in an outside back?
We don't have…"
17 minutes ago
More…