GREAT NEWS !

 For some! This year we are all the same age. We are all the same---erk!!

Take the year you were born ans add to it how old you are. The answer will be 2019!! For examle I am 86 years old and I was born in 1933. Add the to gether and the answer is 2019! For everyone! This comes from the mystical valleys of old Welsh folk lore---The Lloyds are related to these weidoes--- much to my chraing. But to be happy we have won sonething this year!! Wont the TCT fantisize about that.

If you want nore of these momentus trueths from the ilse of yore it will cost you big money---real big.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • No - depends if your birthday is earlier in the year or later in the year. For example if you were born in December you will get 2018

  • It is the same every year nothing special about this year, your year of birth plus your age equals current year.  Unless as wile said it can be different depending if your birthday is before or after.

     

  • Is this post in Welsh ?

  • Anouther robert Lloyd special

    • Sorry robert, I didn’t realise that you were 86 and I’ve taken the absolute piss out of you many times.

      My apologies as I respect my elders dearly.

  • 86! you legend

  • This reply was deleted.
    • This reply was deleted.
      • There's something in that for all of us !

         

  • This blog is one of those little golden mathematical nuggets you might be lucky enough to stumble across once or twice in your lifetime. Keep up the good work bobby!

  • Welsh ancestry here also. I bet you can sing Robert. You must love Sir Harry singing this:

    .......and if that didn't bring a tear to your eye, this surely will. The great Paul Robeson with the best ever rendition of the Welsh National Anthem:

     

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

mongolian trotting duck replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"chief it was agreed by the clubs "
1 minute ago
Muttman replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Arguing for costs is common in the Supreme Court. The losing side commonly cover some of the costs of the winner. The Judge usually decides that before proceedings close.  Yes it may have been negotiated, that's also possible.  But from my…"
7 minutes ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"plus lomaxs costs lol"
13 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 1 Team List v Melbourne Storm
"Joash is that guy if anything the guys we have playing centre and wings are interchangeable if needs be and if Iongi goes down Joash slots right in."
26 minutes ago
More…