Game Vs Souths

How do we stop souths? we have a horrible record against them and latrell is on fire.thoughts?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Hope and pray 

  • Pass to Sivo and hope for the best. 

    • What, next to the sideline when he shows up?

      He needs to step up Sivo and get more involved. He's made 6 tackles in 3 games with 2 missed. Less runs than anyone other than Mahoney, who we all want to run more.

      If it wasn't for some of his 1/2 the field runs, he'd also have made the least amount of meters.

  • wrap around play on our right hand side is where most of the points come from

  • Slide. Souths rarely hit the lead runner and almost always play out the back to a very deep backline. No need to jam in. Souths want you to jam in, they're banking on it. Move up and slide, they'll run out of room.

    • Bingo, Mutt.

      I think Jake is going to have a tough night also, Latrell is going to be coming at him at full speed all night. Ice will need to be a body guard.

      • agree

      • NOS, this is a test of fire for JA, Latrell is so good, so multitalented. JA could be burnt or this game could make him.
        I am going to send JA good juju and visualise JA and the boys choking the bunnies. 

        • For sure MB, watching Latrell verse the Warriors its almost ridiculous how good he is. He's come back from that injury / US treatment a whole different athlete which is scary.

          Jake did a good job last week & made some great 1 on 1 tackles of Garrick, but as you said, this is a test of fire for him & probably Penisini also. 

          • thought he got caught out with the sliding attack. he always seemed to run into the opposition plkayer inorder to cover across

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to Steel be with you's discussion 2026 Parramatta Eels Season Preview
"A good preview, Steel. A neat wrap up. Short and sweet. Relaxed. No expletives. Thumbs up."
9 minutes ago
iamnot replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion ‘Leaks and grandstanding’: Storm boss unloads on Eels over Lomax
"Didn't Ryles have an additional clause in his contract relating to Bellamy? That is, if Bellamy signed on for another season, Ryles weas free to just walk?"
2 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion ‘Leaks and grandstanding’: Storm boss unloads on Eels over Lomax
"When that's what's coming out of their pieholes you know they are flapping.
It's not even another fruit, it's like comparing Apples & Dildos 
( I see that you have overcome your crippling Porn addiction Kurupt...good on you)"
2 hours ago
Kurupt - He Be Trippin On A Matt replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion ‘Leaks and grandstanding’: Storm boss unloads on Eels over Lomax
"True, Ryles would have a get out clause and he would have been the one who applied for the Eels job, Parra didn't need to do sh!t with the Storm. He's trying to compare apples with oranges."
6 hours ago
More…