Five Most Successful Team Traits

HOW TO HIRE THE BESTGoogle Spent 2 Years Studying 180 Teams. The Most Successful Ones Shared These 5 TraitsInsights from Google's new study could forever change how teams are assembled.By Michael Schneider@MSchneiderTwtsCREDIT: Courtesy GoogleOver the years, Google has embarked on countless quests, collected endless amounts of data, and spent millions trying to better understand its people. One of the company's most interesting initiatives, Project Aristotle, gathered several of Google's best and brightest to help the organization codify the secrets to team effectiveness.Specifically, Google wanted to know why some teams excelled while others fell behind.Before this study, like many other organizations, Google Execs believed that building the best teams meant compiling the best people. It makes sense. The best engineer plus an MBA, throw in a PhD, and there you have it. The perfect team, right? In the words of Julia Rozovsky, Google's people analytics manager, "We were dead wrong."Selected to lead the efforts was Abeer Dubey, Google's Director of People Analytics (HR). Eager to find the perfect mixture of skills, backgrounds, and traits to engineer super-teams, Dubey recruited statisticians, organizational psychologists, sociologists, engineers, and researchers to help solve the riddle. Included in this all-star lineup was Rozovsky.Fast forward two years, and Project Aristotle has managed to study 180 Google teams, conduct 200-plus interviews, and analyze over 250 different team attributes. Unfortunately, though, there was still no clear pattern of characteristics that could be plugged into a dream-team generating algorithm.As described in an article in The New York Times, it wasn't until Google started considering some intangibles that things began to fall into place."As they struggled to figure out what made a team successful, Rozovsky and her colleagues kept coming across research by psychologists and sociologists that focused on what are known as "group norms" - the traditions, behavioral standards, and unwritten rules that govern how teams function when they gather... Norms can be unspoken or openly acknowledged, but their influence is often profound."With a new lens and some added direction from a research study on collective intelligence (abilities that emerge out of collaboration) by a group of psychologists from Carnegie Mellon, MIT, and Union College, Project Aristotle's researchers went back to the drawing board to comb their data for unspoken customs. Specifically, any team behaviors that magnified the collective intelligence of the group.Through Google's Re:Work website, a resource that shares Google's research, ideas, and practices on people operations, Rozovsky outlined the five key characteristics of enhanced teams.1. Dependability.Team members get things done on time and meet expectations.2. Structure and clarity.High-performing teams have clear goals, and have well-defined roles within the group.3. Meaning.The work has personal significance to each member.4. Impact.The group believes their work is purposeful and positively impacts the greater good.Yes, that's four, not five. The last one stood out from the rest:5. Psychological Safety.We've all been in meetings and, due to the fear of seeming incompetent, have held back questions or ideas. I get it. It's unnerving to feel like you're in an environment where everything you do or say is under a microscope.But imagine a different setting. A situation in which everyone is safe to take risks, voice their opinions, and ask judgment-free questions. A culture where managers provide air cover and create safe zones so employees can let down their guard. That's psychological safety.I know, not the quantitative data that you were hoping for. However, Google found that teams with psychologically safe environments had employees who were less likely to leave, more likely to harness the power of diversity, and ultimately, who were more successful.Engineering the perfect team is more subjective than we would like, but focusing on these five components increases the likelihood that you will build a dream team. Through its research, Google made the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle proud by proving, "The whole can be greater than the sum of its parts."

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Very interesting article and I think you could extrapolate the findings to see it applied in sports teams. Take Melbourne for example.

    1. Every man works for the guy next to him and get their jobs done.

    2. They are the most structured team in the NRL and they're clearly working to a set goal in both individual games and across a season.

    3. Meaning - I guess it's a bit hard to understand the personal meaning behind the way they play but I'd imagine the lure of a Premiership and success is a driving force.

    4. Impact - Clearly a win for them impacts not only the team but the club, sponsors and wider fan base.

    5. Security - Bellamy showed during the 2010 salary cap saga that he shielded the players as best he could and made it clear that they had nothing to do with it. Believe it or not, Bellamy showed he'd protect his players when the going gets tough.

    If we look at Parramatta I'd say they're building towards a similar set-up and culture. The players have repeatedly spoken of the camaraderie in the squad and the way BA always puts the players first. 

  • Wow. They just described the Melbourne Storm.
  • Interesting information and makes a lot of sense

    Accountability and clear knowledge of your role and what is expected, yet a safe environment to operate in where all parties can voice their opinion and it has value
  • 5 is pure and utter BS.

    If you KNOW your product - have confidence in your product and believe your product is the best available you will not pussy on about speaking up.

    It is also about self belief, respect and acceptance.

    No one can make you feel inferior without your consent. - Eleanor Roosevelt

  • hqdefault.jpg

    Only 4 replies... something smells in here

  • Not too many letters from ejaculate, I think that's the angle he was going for

    • Yep, probably a typo..?

      • Too much substance on his keys to type properly 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

EA replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Cooper Cronk: On the Parramatta Eels, Pezet, Lomax and Recruitment
"Yea he is mainly a 5/8, If Lorenzo for some reason fails, Risati is the next option. He is a bigger body than Lorenzo with a great running and passing game. He turns 18 next year so will be in SG Ball alongside Fletcher.
Long term, I belive we can…"
15 minutes ago
KN replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Cooper Cronk: On the Parramatta Eels, Pezet, Lomax and Recruitment
"He is special mate!
5/8, Fullback. Plays Wallabies and Waratahs aswell, so hopefully he stays the course for league and parra."
20 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Cooper Cronk: On the Parramatta Eels, Pezet, Lomax and Recruitment
"EA, do you have any thoughts on Risati? Heard big raps on him. The way people talk about him, he could be a long-term six solution, alongside Fletcher at seven. Who knows. We're talking years down the track, but just curious."
42 minutes ago
EA replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Cooper Cronk: On the Parramatta Eels, Pezet, Lomax and Recruitment
"Your right. We need to build from within the pathways. We have an elite prospect in every position. It's just that those centre and wingers are only in SG Ball next year. Every other position, they are already in JF or Cup"
1 hour ago
More…