Replies

  • Probably Gutherson. Gutho always pledges his live for Arthur in the media, but then he complains about dollars offered by the club being to low for his lifestyle,  give me a break.

    If Gutherson was captain material he should have dumped Sam Ayub straight after he put crap on the club last time.  Imagine Boyd Cordener sticking with a manager who pisses on his club. That's no captain 

    • Oh Chief!.... Gutho would have been debriefed by the Coach selection process before they chose to extend BA,

    • Can't say I'm surprised to be honest, assuming RCG is one of them.

      The club should have shown him the door in 2018.

      Scott

      • But RCG wasn't here in 2018...

  • Can't be true.  The players all love playing for him remember!

  • I'm not defending BA but this is pure junk, rumour mongering. There's no basis behind it at all. It's classic click bait, don't fall for it. 

    • How can you be sure Mutt's??

      It makes sense to me, the JA thing did more damage than many realise.

      • This ^^^

      • The way the senior players played vs Melbourne and in the Finals. Gutho and Moses stating categorically on Foxsports that they pulled BA aside and told him they back him 100% during the losing streak. This squad did not come across as a team with a problem. Plus, there's zero evidence of this so called rumour. 

        • This ^^^

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Coryn Hughes replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"In all essence this case is very black n white but Lomax's lawyers will be looking for avenues that will highlight different that's the key here is for us not to get drawn into the Lomax arguement but to stay on track and highlight what's been…"
2 hours ago
Clintorian replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Not to mention all the other teams in Rugby he could be playing in."
6 hours ago
Muttman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"It's now out of the NRL's hands. If the court says the conditions of the release are valid and still stand then that is that. The NRL can't stomp all over the Eels' legal rights.  Lomax told the Eels in writing he was proceeding with the Storm…"
8 hours ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"You'd think it's in the NRL's best interest to be on Parra's side here. If they take the side of Lomax then every player contract means nothing. This is bigger than a single case- it could open up a world where players do whatever they want,…"
9 hours ago
More…