Replies

          • So you take the 2 names  Simmoeel0891 posted as being the disgruntled payers and you assume that's correct; even though he didn't provide any proof or a source. Then you carry on with the rumour as if it's true by justifying it with your own rational. What's even worse, you and others discuss it as if it's fact.

            Can't you see how you're just adding to the noise without saying anything?!?!?

          • This reply was deleted.
            • This reply was deleted.
      • RCG had player option so no offer required. He didn't take it. 

        He wants a longer contract from 2023 - that is all.

      • RCG is not off contract, he had an option in his favour which he declined. 

  • Can confirm that this is absolutely not true. I know a lot of the fans are a bit indifferent towards BA(myself included), but I know a few players in the team and they've all told me that the players absolutely love BA. I guess there's a lot that we don't see behind the scenes, but the players love him.

  • Ah NRL journalism, where everything's made up and the points don't matter.

    On the plus side it's nice that the articles about the Eels are all rumour-mill contract stuff and we haven't had any players involved in anything dodgy (touch wood).

  • Guthos isnt one.....

    Moses either....

    Or Jnr....

    Thats leaves the rest.

  • The money that Penrith were contributing drops off which is why the option is in RCGs favour for '23. There is also an option in Parra's favour if RCG takes up the option for '23. This is why RCG is not taking up the option. RCG is happy at Parra but is likely to get more money if he renegotiates 

  • What a load of crap...............

    I could make something up right now and Bang !!!!!!! @ A rumour is born.    Some people seriously need to find a rewarding life instead of attacking our club and coaches non stop... Its tedious and getting damn boring.

     

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Yehez replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Your Team list v Dragons - Kelma must stay
"Agreed. I won't renew him no matter how well he plays. He was still sketchy yesterday. He is a good impact bench player against tired edges and Moses slipping him balls. "
1 hour ago
Yehez replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Your Team list v Dragons - Kelma must stay
"Hmmm. The only in would be Moretti for me. Maybe. I'd let him maybe have more time in reggies first. I'd keep Guymer. 
So basically, same team. Yes even De Belin. I want De Belin to be in the team first few rounds then things will change IMO. Him…"
1 hour ago
Gucci replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Your Team list v Dragons - Kelma must stay
"The only change we need to make is Hopgood back to 13 and JDB to 18 man. Not sure why he needs a spot in the squad as he is only practically here for 1 year and really provides nothing more than what Hopgood or Doorey can do for 25min. Walker has…"
3 hours ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Your Team list v Dragons - Kelma must stay
"Brisbane's play the ball speed was quicker, but later on we got control of the ruck, poking our nose through and getting on our elbows for quick play the balls, Brisbane were out on their feet. Tawha was having a tough time keeping up and Mam…"
4 hours ago
More…