Rumour on Sky Sports Radio this morning, there's a few senior players not happy Jan about super coach BA extending. I'm sure some can work out who they are.
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"He played 134 of his 264 games as a winger. Didnt complain once like a Lomax when required on the wing. Was a team man through and through. He deserves to be in the Modern Day Best Eels team somewhere. Perhaps now that we have 6 interchange players…"
" I understand the modern day theory. It has to be the players that would work in the modern day game, But the theory should include how a player from the say 80s would perform given the modern day technology and training regime.
You cant simply…"
You cant simply…"
"Sorry should have clarified, 1998 NRL era.
I stuck to what i knew best. I love Luke Burt, still my favourite ever player, hence the dp. He didn't have that flashy skills like Hayne and was undersized but to accomplish 260+ games is an achievement…"
I stuck to what i knew best. I love Luke Burt, still my favourite ever player, hence the dp. He didn't have that flashy skills like Hayne and was undersized but to accomplish 260+ games is an achievement…"
"Can you define what era / year your modern day starts from.
I took Jarryd Hayne on your survey, but I also loved Luke Burt as a team man. Luke Burt reminded me so much of little Paul Taylor, did so much work but never got the credit he deserved."
I took Jarryd Hayne on your survey, but I also loved Luke Burt as a team man. Luke Burt reminded me so much of little Paul Taylor, did so much work but never got the credit he deserved."
Replies
So you take the 2 names Simmoeel0891 posted as being the disgruntled payers and you assume that's correct; even though he didn't provide any proof or a source. Then you carry on with the rumour as if it's true by justifying it with your own rational. What's even worse, you and others discuss it as if it's fact.
Can't you see how you're just adding to the noise without saying anything?!?!?
Yawn.....
Scott
RCG had player option so no offer required. He didn't take it.
He wants a longer contract from 2023 - that is all.
RCG is not off contract, he had an option in his favour which he declined.
Can confirm that this is absolutely not true. I know a lot of the fans are a bit indifferent towards BA(myself included), but I know a few players in the team and they've all told me that the players absolutely love BA. I guess there's a lot that we don't see behind the scenes, but the players love him.
Ah NRL journalism, where everything's made up and the points don't matter.
On the plus side it's nice that the articles about the Eels are all rumour-mill contract stuff and we haven't had any players involved in anything dodgy (touch wood).
Classic Drew
Guthos isnt one.....
Moses either....
Or Jnr....
Thats leaves the rest.
The money that Penrith were contributing drops off which is why the option is in RCGs favour for '23. There is also an option in Parra's favour if RCG takes up the option for '23. This is why RCG is not taking up the option. RCG is happy at Parra but is likely to get more money if he renegotiates
What a load of crap...............
I could make something up right now and Bang !!!!!!! @ A rumour is born. Some people seriously need to find a rewarding life instead of attacking our club and coaches non stop... Its tedious and getting damn boring.
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
of 9 Next