Replies

          • So you take the 2 names  Simmoeel0891 posted as being the disgruntled payers and you assume that's correct; even though he didn't provide any proof or a source. Then you carry on with the rumour as if it's true by justifying it with your own rational. What's even worse, you and others discuss it as if it's fact.

            Can't you see how you're just adding to the noise without saying anything?!?!?

          • This reply was deleted.
            • This reply was deleted.
      • RCG had player option so no offer required. He didn't take it. 

        He wants a longer contract from 2023 - that is all.

      • RCG is not off contract, he had an option in his favour which he declined. 

  • Can confirm that this is absolutely not true. I know a lot of the fans are a bit indifferent towards BA(myself included), but I know a few players in the team and they've all told me that the players absolutely love BA. I guess there's a lot that we don't see behind the scenes, but the players love him.

  • Ah NRL journalism, where everything's made up and the points don't matter.

    On the plus side it's nice that the articles about the Eels are all rumour-mill contract stuff and we haven't had any players involved in anything dodgy (touch wood).

  • Guthos isnt one.....

    Moses either....

    Or Jnr....

    Thats leaves the rest.

  • The money that Penrith were contributing drops off which is why the option is in RCGs favour for '23. There is also an option in Parra's favour if RCG takes up the option for '23. This is why RCG is not taking up the option. RCG is happy at Parra but is likely to get more money if he renegotiates 

  • What a load of crap...............

    I could make something up right now and Bang !!!!!!! @ A rumour is born.    Some people seriously need to find a rewarding life instead of attacking our club and coaches non stop... Its tedious and getting damn boring.

     

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Moses SC asks the court: "Did Tripp make it up? Or who's telling the truth (Tripp or HQ)?"
Tripp, the Storm boss, made an implied threat towards the Eels saying the NRL could punish the Eels if it held firm on Lomax by issuing a salary cap sanction,…"
1 minute ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Will V'landy's will be asked to testify? He's already had his bird return once due to air-con challenges. Abdo? They could confirm it's all a misunderstanding, and they never had any intentions of doing what Storm said they were going to do."
51 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"They should be shitting themselves, they thought they could just walk all over us and we wouldn't do anything about it, dodgy cunts."
53 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Iongi: Recent Illicit Substance Scandals vs NRL Sanctions
"Got any priors for players done for weed. I don't recall any.
Unlike weed, everything on that list is a class A. drug.
 "
1 hour ago
More…