Eels win in the Supreme Court

Summary:

Zac Lomax has settled his legal dispute with the Parramatta Eels, agreeing he cannot return to the NRL without the club’s written consent before the 2028 season.

In a surprise development in the NSW Supreme Court, both parties reached a settlement that largely upholds the original terms of his release. Lomax will now be free to return to the NRL without Parramatta’s consent in 2028 instead of 2029 — but until then, he remains restricted.

This means he cannot join the Melbourne Storm unless the Eels provide written approval.

As part of the agreement, Melbourne must pay $250,000 towards Parramatta’s legal costs.

The dispute arose after Lomax was released from his $700,000-per-year contract to pursue an opportunity in the failed R360 rugby union competition. Parramatta included a clause preventing him from signing with another NRL club until November 2028 without their consent. Negotiations between Melbourne and Parramatta broke down over transfer fees and player swap proposals before the matter was resolved in court.
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/zac-lomax-once-again-in-contract-limbo-after-settling-with-parramatta/news-story/28e01750be0a26c3e610008358d71d71

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

      • There must be something big and juicy in there for this to be the outcome.

        • It is the ONLY explanation.

        • 100%. Settled and paid Parramatta because of this. But I still think a swap deal is being worked out, they just couldnt get the whole deal done in time. Both the Storm and NRL did not want this to play out in court, it will go back to behind closed doors.

  • This is basically a FU to VLandy's & Abdo for their support to the Storm. I've no doubt the NRL had a hand in this settlement and wouldn't be surprised if they pay the $250k.
    Handing over records showing they favoured one club over another wouldn't have been a good look for the administartors of the game.

    Let's see how they handle the narrative moving forward.

    • This makes me very happy.

  • I still think a swap deal will be done. There has to be something behind this with the this situation being resolved before it began.   

    • Of course there is something behind this, the NRL and the Storm didn't want all their dirty laundry to be aired.

      • Spot on. Many in socials didn't understand 

      • Yep. Great point Meeiks 

      • Exactly, MeelK. 100% agree. Which could also be protection against the NRL if they plan to try and get some sort of payback.

        What a sensational win by the Eels this is. Stoked we didn't fold an accept financial compensation & a player not worthy of the transfer.

        Massive congrats to entire club for setting this precendent.

        Now to go down to Melbourne and embarrass them at home, as well as in the courtroom.

         

         

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

The Captain replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"I have a feeling the NRL will be pretty nice to us for a while given we obviously have a few smoking guns they obviously don't want public."
2 seconds ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Just one question, and i don't think it will matter much because Lomax will get a league deal somewhere  -  was the 3 years  reduced to 2 as part of an agreement between the two clubs or was it ordered by the courts.
Thats the only part that is…"
1 minute ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion One of these 6 players will be an Eel
"moale has a 3yr deal at manly starting in 27"
1 minute ago
The Captain replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"$250k in our legal fees. Didn't they also agree to pay Lomaxs?"
2 minutes ago
More…