Eels Membership Record

The Eels have broken their membership record. See story here:

https://www.parraeels.com.au/news/2021/09/02/parramatta-eels-membership-breaks-all-time-record/

This is great news for the club, in spite of some of the bumbling efforts from the membership team. If we can push deep into the finals I reckon we'll see another bump next season.

As a point of comparison, here are all clubs current official membership levels from NRL.com:

9525873101?profile=RESIZE_584x

As shown, we are leading the way, about 1600 more than the window licking wabbits.

Go Parra!

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Yep, good result for everyone involved in membership. 

  • Truly outstanding result from everyone involved at the club. Simply amazing. 
    How bad are those Broncos numbers? They have the entire city to themselves. Ouch. 

  • Wow. Imagine if we actually won the comp!

    • If we won the comp I'd imagine we'd break the 50,000 barrier.

  • This is a huge result, especially given how badly COVID has impacted the fan/member experience this year.

  • Another interesting point of comparison is the AFL. The two lowest club memberships in the AFL are the Gold Coast with 19,000, then GWS with 30,000. These are two very new clubs. The Swans have 50,000, and the two highest clubs have over 100,000. There is no reason why the Eels can't at least reach the numbers the Swans have.

    • Ya gotta love those $5 AFL memberships

      • The Eels offered $20 memberships late this season. Not a whole lot of difference really. But it is another name on the list to target...

  • Surprised the Panthers are that low.

  • Now you know why the Eels are always in the news. We're the biggest brand in the league.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hector replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Triple M - eels not fazed if Lomax leaves.
"Exactly Dave  the merry go  round  keeps on going round and round i. Just keep on getting a massive headache with all this shit just gets rehashed and rehashed over and over and over again and again "
15 minutes ago
Slippery. replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Triple M - eels not fazed if Lomax leaves.

 When comparing players, ability is only half the comparison. The other important part is the amount the players are being paid. When comparing the loss of a higher paid player with his replacement on less money, you must include the money saved…"
41 minutes ago
Clayton replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Triple M - eels not fazed if Lomax leaves.
"That is a fundamentalist assessment of the salary cap. More intricate than that. "
57 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Triple M - eels not fazed if Lomax leaves.
"Does anyone give any credibility to reports the Eels would "not be fazed" if Lomax left? Lomax made SOO and the Kangaroos (before withdrawing), is in the Top 20 metres per game and runs per game, is a first or second choice goal kicker, can play…"
1 hour ago
More…