31062148854?profile=RESIZE_710x

 

Parramatta have made their position crystal clear, with football boss Jim Sarantinos stating the club will not consent to the player signing with another NRL side unless there is an appropriate exchange of value. Speaking firmly, Sarantinos emphasised that the Eels see no reason to disadvantage themselves by allowing a release without adequate compensation, reinforcing the club’s commitment to protecting its roster and long-term interests. The stance signals that any potential move will need to deliver clear benefits to Parramatta, not just the player or rival clubs.

 
 
 

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • We would take Stefano or take Jack Howarth and Josiah Pahulu. That's only fair they are getting a top 3 winger in the comp. 

  • I applaud the club and Jim Sarantinos for coming out and clearly stating the club’s position publicly—before the Storm, Team Lomax, V’landys, or the RLPA.

    Framing the narrative from the outset matters, and the club has done exactly that.

  • I really hope we hold firm on this.

    We obviously have planned for not having Lomax and don't need Howarth or any other 2nd rung player.

    • From the looks of it Badger, seems Parramatta are open to a player swap as Sarantinos mentioned compensation.

  • The storm will reject a player swap that doesn't move them forward. They want to improve their team too. Don't be surprised if it ends up being lomax for money

    • How does money work though? Money on the cap? 

      • No, doesn't add to our cap. Money is useless as far as this situation goes.

      • Money is no good to us we need a player

    • We hold all the cards will. Storm can eat a bag of dicks for all I care. We need a quality replacement for probably the best winger in the game. We have plenty of money, We need to win a comp

  • It is no offense to Howarth to say Howarth for Lomax is not an "appropriate exchange of value". There would need to be SOO or National honours involved. Probably only Utoikamanu fits the bill? But also, the Eels lost a representative back which they have not replaced like-for-like. Thus, is a prop added to a roster that already includes Paulo, Tuivati, DeBelin, Hopgoode and Williams as experienced middles "appropriate exchange of value"?

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Perpetual Motion replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels Dig In on Player Release, Demand Fair Value in Any Deal
"Jack Howarth has been selected for the Queensland State of Origin squad as a reserve and was in the extended squad for Game II of the 2025 series but didn't play a senior game, being ruled out of Game I by injury and Game III by appendicitis, so…"
8 minutes ago
Yawn replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"Someone explain to me please. Say the Eels and the Storm do a deal and Lowtothemax is allowed to play with them how are the terms of the traded player worked out. "
14 minutes ago
Eels2025 replied to Roy tannous's discussion Does anyone know what it is ?
"For who "
15 minutes ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to Roy tannous's discussion Does anyone know what it is ?
"Done deal"
18 minutes ago
More…