Parramatta chief executive Jim Sarantinos has urged fans to keep backing the judgment of Jason Ryles after the Eels coach emerged as the key figure in the decision to sever ties with Zac Lomax.
The Eels confirmed on Sunday that they had agreed to release Lomax from the final three years of his contract, with the NSW and Australian winger expected to switch codes and eventually sign with rebel rugby union competition R360.
There have been whispers he will spend time in Japanese rugby before then. He has, however, likely played his last game in the NRL after the Eels decided they were better served spending their money on a player who was fully committed to the club. Ultimately, club bosses made the call in consultation with Ryles.
“He (Lomax) made it clear he wanted to pursue opportunities elsewhere,” Sarantinos said. “There’s obviously been that connection with R360. I really don’t know where that is at. I have no idea. “But he came forward to us and he asked if we would consider releasing him early. The main stakeholder in this is the coach. He’s been pretty decisive and strong around decisions he has made in regards to personnel.”
“I think the view was that if we have a player whose focus may be elsewhere and the opportunities came to exit that situation sooner rather than later, and it gives you an opportunity to strengthen your roster somewhere else, why not do that.”
“It’s not something we have been planning for the long term. But obviously we’ll look internally, we’ll look at who is available and we will look at the balance of the roster.”
Lomax’s departure is expected to strengthen the Eels’ bid to sign South Sydney and Kangaroos forward Keaon Koloamatangi, who came on the market on November 1. The Rabbitohs are fighting hard to keep Koloamatangi, but whispers are growing louder that he has had his head turned by Parramatta.
When asked whether he was surprised that Lomax had decided to leave, having fought so hard to get out of his deal at St George Illawarra to move to the Eels, Sarantinos said: “I don’t think you sign any player for four years and expect that 12 months into the contract they are going to be looking at other opportunities. Things change. When we signed Zac, Brad (Arthur) was coach. We probably didn’t expect that would be the situation. Now we have Rylesy in place and he’s been pretty clear with all the decisions he has made around personnel.”
It is understood that a transfer fee has been included as one of the conditions of Lomax’s release from his contract. The size of the release fee remains a closely guarded secret - this masthead was told it was a significant figure.
If Lomax is R360 bound, they will need to stump up plenty of cash to secure his signature for their inaugural competition in October next year.
Not that money appears to be an issue. Nor do the 10-year bans that have been threatened by the NRL for players who join the breakaway league.
They certainly don’t appear to have affected Lomax’s decision.
“I have no idea what R360’s strategy is,” Sarantinos said. “Are they looking to tear the NRL apart or are they looking to pick and choose NRL players. I don’t know how much of a deterrent the bans from the NRL will play. For some players it will be a major deterrent. For other players it may not matter.”
Replies
True, don't need a plant to come in and ruin Parramatta, they can do that by themselves.
Lomax was on 850 k l- 900k at Parramatta. Ask yourself is 850 for a winger outrageous money.
Why do you think flannagan didn't stand in his way
Brad Arthur thought he could turn him into a representative centre - bs. That's why brad offered him 850k. Lomax has always had too many deficiencies to play center. But ba didn't see it
Also at the dragons Lomax was on 900k
If people think Lomax came to parramatta for 650 its a 100% load of shit.
What player would come to a club for 650k when we had no chance of making the finals and wasn't on 900k at the dragons
You guys have had the wool pulled over your eyes.
650k lol unbelievable 😆
650 for the position he was playing was a high salary for wingers back then and was middling for a strike centre.900 where are you getting this BS from chief do you like continuing to pull figures out of your arsehole and throw a guy under the bus who hasn't been here for almost 2 years.
Your just like the people that run the club when it goes tits up it's someone else's doing.
Rent free I see it still runs strong.
@CHIEFY Mclovin
Chiefy you must be the most stupid person we have ever had on 1EE.
The absolute rubbish you have maintained in regard to a wingers price means you have no idea his value as a player. If he was purely a winger and nothing else I could half understand, but you obviously as demonstrated by being the "village idiot" have no understanding what he brought/brings to the team.....if Moses left tomorrow I would love to see how you convert it to a BA foilble and him really only worth 900k and we paid too much anyway. Do you think Moses would not want to keep him at 1 million!
You have got yourself the dishonourable "immortal vote" as the inaugral winner of the site (1EE) Dope of the Year!
He said looking internally first.
That's a good sign 🙄🙄🙄🙄
You can tell it's the off-season, this blog certainly woke up our resident conspiracy theorists.
For those that haven't listened to the interview with our goober CEO.
https://www.2gb.com/how-well-spend-zacs-money-eels-boss-on-parras-p...
Now I usually am pretty good at reading between the lines. Typically when we are asked about player information we hear "Zac is currently under contract" or something similar indicating our head office has fucked another deal or contract. In this interview when asked about Keaon and Nelson, Jim was upbeat... take it as you will. I feel good news is coming with atleast one of those names coming.
"Zak is under contract" means we're not letting him go unless it suits us.
Why do you think he did not enforce the contract Pou?
Personally I find it difficult to accept the rhetoric of we don't want him if he doesn't want to be here.
That sets and example for anyone wanting to leave, Lomax as a player I could not imagine him not trying for 3 years in such a situation. I even expect that he may have been offered a new deal on higher dollars and that did not broach what he has been offered alternatively.......will we have know the "truth"???
If the dragons were paying 800k. Why would Lomax come to brad arthur for 650k. Use your head
Parramatta weren't a top 8 team. The reality is Brad paid 850 - 900k to get Lomax and preached that he would be our Australian rep centre for years to come.
If people think Lomax forgoes 800 - 850 to join Arthur for 650 lol. They have rocks for brains.
That's the reason Ryles didn't stand in his way, Lomax was never going to be a top line centre here and no winger should be on 850k at any club
650 mentioned was just a cover please the fans. Arthur was desperate to land a big fish in his finals years and knew his head was on the chopping block. He pulled the wool over everyone's eyes thinking he'd nabbed the best centre in the game
There's no chance Lomax's 4 seasons averaged out to $ 650 unbelievable how gullible some fans are
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
of 7 Next