You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"If you're at the back end of your career it could still be worth it. Your agent wont be able to be involved "officially". I think this is a good move by the NRL. It sends a very clear message. Now the players know where they stand. Some will…"
"Crime / Weather / Family life / Poverty?
They should have continued with them playing during the season in National type games but added more. Its also about the common sense approach; the NRL should have ensured NZ have two teams - for me this…"
They should have continued with them playing during the season in National type games but added more. Its also about the common sense approach; the NRL should have ensured NZ have two teams - for me this…"
"Players will not go there unless they're earning 2 or 3 times the offers they'll be attracting here. Even there and it's a fucking dive of a place. Not one positive to mention. It's a dangerous shithole and it's not if , it's when , a player or…"
Replies
So, 3/8 of the Top 8 missed more tackles than the Eels.
Can you please express this using percentages Daz
37.5% of the Top 8 are about as bad as the Eels for missed tackles. Or, 50% of the Top 4 are about as bad as the Eels for missed tackles. Put differently, even if the Eels make zero improvement in their missed tackle count, if you tossed a coin once they have just as much chance making the Top 4 as not. Thus, why bother getting better at tackling, if it's no better than random chance to get you into the Top 4?
Brought to you by The Devils Guide to Statistics.
What does missed tackles per game correlate to?
Saints were the best — they missed least tackles per game — and came third-last on the ladder.
Panthers were third-worst & ended up with the third-best defence. Talagi missing 6-10 tackles a game doesn't help the stats...
nrl.com stats