I thought Kite and Pritchard had pretty ordinary games yesterday. Do you think these players were carried by the other players on both sides. I still have big doubts about bringing in Watmough in. I think it is a retrograde step. Hunger from the younger players seemed to have a bigger part of both teams performances. What about Souths East game of Friday any similar comparisons? Any statisticians out their who can find out average age of historical Premiership winning teams?.
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
Replies
I'd say it was the experience players for the Bulldogs such as James Graham, Sam Perrett, Josh Morris and Aiden Tolman who led the way. Penrith didn't have the experience to be able to really fight their way back into it. You're simply grasping at straws and trying to draw conclusion where there isn't any.
The Penrith players looked like a deer in the headlights, their inexperience definitely counted against them. For all the talk of Matt Moylan, I barely heard his name called at all in the first half.
Yeah I reckon Pennies did really well to get that far with their injury toll and roster.
Hodkinson's kicking game was above Soward's. With such a big pack you can't be giving the Dogs an easy start to their sets. You need a mixture of youth and experience. Our average age is around 22-23 with the average game mark around 100. You're not going to go deep into September with that kind of side. That's why we've bought Watmough. He's done it all before. He's won comps, Origin series and a World Cup. He's the type of player our younger guys can learn off. You put all the pressure on our young blokes without a forwards leader and they'll collapse.
Geez Tad I was watching that game thinking the exact opposite of Kite's game.
Was thinking what a good purchase he was for the Panthers at a cheap price more than likely.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next