De Gois or Peats.

It would appear that after last nights performance BA, is going to have to make a tough decision next year in regards to the Hooker role, considering that Peat's was in brilliant form at the beginning of the season and he was considered for SOO 1, and whilst De Gois was absouloutley brilliant last night, brilliant tackle's & speed out of Dummy half.

So who would you pick to start Peats or De Gois?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Peats is a far better player. But its nice to have suck great depth in the hooker department for a change.
  • Peats 

  • degois has only played one decent game thus far....peats for me

  • Peats. But considering he's had knee and shoulder recos this year it might be worthwhile to carry a hooker on the bench
  • No question it's Peats.... IDG was only bought as a replacement and will be off the bench beginning of next year until Peats is 100% to play 80min then unfortunately IDG will be Wenty's starting Hooker.

  • Hands down, Peats,

  • Peats performance at the start was actually better than Cameron Smiths.
    Nothing wrong carrying 2 hookers allowing peats to play 55-60 mins and using a fresh De gois for 20-25 mins.
    Brian Smith loved this ploy and stated "changes throughout a match aren't necessarily used on tiring players but to up the tempo at particular stages throughout a match"
  • Both. Peats will start with De Gois off the bench. BA may even adopt a similar role in which Peats played some minutes in the back row at Souths.
    • Marsh and Riddell Version 2.0

    • I agree but IMO DeG would also be effective as a lock for short periods in the game if BA elected to leave Peats on & bring DeG off the bench. His defence last night was terrific & for a bloke at the latter part of his career, he never stops. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"Money as in on the cap?"
43 seconds ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"Based on what? Hearing from many within the game he has no legs to stand on, including lawyers saying so too. Only way we end up with nothing i believe is NRL saying to us just give him to them and strong arming us which i doubt they care to do."
1 minute ago
LB replied to LB's discussion NAS was offered $800k from Parramatta
"Well Shane Gillis was on Kent podcast and i understand he would say professional things but god he talks a lot of shit. Supporting Clinton and Lomax."
3 minutes ago
LB replied to LB's discussion NAS was offered $800k from Parramatta
"Just going off the report, didn't say NAS said that. I said he admitted offer from Warriors, should have reworded that it was mentioned a $800k offer."
5 minutes ago
More…