De Gois or Peats.

It would appear that after last nights performance BA, is going to have to make a tough decision next year in regards to the Hooker role, considering that Peat's was in brilliant form at the beginning of the season and he was considered for SOO 1, and whilst De Gois was absouloutley brilliant last night, brilliant tackle's & speed out of Dummy half.

So who would you pick to start Peats or De Gois?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Peats is a far better player. But its nice to have suck great depth in the hooker department for a change.
  • Peats 

  • degois has only played one decent game thus far....peats for me

  • Peats. But considering he's had knee and shoulder recos this year it might be worthwhile to carry a hooker on the bench
  • No question it's Peats.... IDG was only bought as a replacement and will be off the bench beginning of next year until Peats is 100% to play 80min then unfortunately IDG will be Wenty's starting Hooker.

  • Hands down, Peats,

  • Peats performance at the start was actually better than Cameron Smiths.
    Nothing wrong carrying 2 hookers allowing peats to play 55-60 mins and using a fresh De gois for 20-25 mins.
    Brian Smith loved this ploy and stated "changes throughout a match aren't necessarily used on tiring players but to up the tempo at particular stages throughout a match"
  • Both. Peats will start with De Gois off the bench. BA may even adopt a similar role in which Peats played some minutes in the back row at Souths.
    • Marsh and Riddell Version 2.0

    • I agree but IMO DeG would also be effective as a lock for short periods in the game if BA elected to leave Peats on & bring DeG off the bench. His defence last night was terrific & for a bloke at the latter part of his career, he never stops. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Zip zip replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion NRL THREATEN 10-YEAR BAN FOR R360 DEFECTORS
"None of us are lawyers. From what it reads, it's a massive deterrent for anyone thinking of R360. Let's be honest, this R360 is doing nothing for grass roots rugby development. It's all about lining the pockets of the backers. I am actually…"
16 minutes ago
Michael W. replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion NRL THREATEN 10-YEAR BAN FOR R360 DEFECTORS
"They don't want players breaking contracts mid contract, but the NRL is fine with clubs offloading players mid contract. "
25 minutes ago
Kurupt - Porn Addict, But I'm In Control replied to EA's discussion Bailey Simonsson To Remain At The Eels
"How bout now?"
36 minutes ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion NRL THREATEN 10-YEAR BAN FOR R360 DEFECTORS
"The NRL will come out of this looking stupid. When roosters or broncos decide they want a player, the loopholes will be exposed.  They are already talking up Mark Nawaqanitawase going back to rugby for a year or 2 and returning to NRL so why should…"
36 minutes ago
More…