David Fifita

Curious as to others thoughts.. with David Fafita free to negotiate with other clubs from November 1st, what bearing may yesterdays result have on his intent to stay with the Broncos?

Parramatta are building something special for years to come, the money on offer is very very competitive.....

 

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I saw Fifita at the end of the games shaking hands and ended with Ma’u and had a longer word and admiring look and respect. Hopefully after that games he sees us and wants to be apart of it. Broncos need to buy playmakers and won’t have the money idc who they get rid of I think they’ll still be too tight. Milford might leave, Macca might, Bird might, Boyd might, but getting rid of them will cost money. I only see us having the money to buy him and he’s too perfect of an option to replace ma’u. I think we could get him for 850-900k if we offer 5 years. 

    • I’m sorry pork and beans I don’t like it. 900 k for 5 years, he’s a good foward but not worth that lol

      • It’s either him or Matterson for 500+. Lane and him are probably too similar. 

        • i also say Matterson , he is the best replacement for Mau

          I think most clubs (other than the roosters) struggle with their cap with Million $ players

          Hardworking, skillful players at half the price are what we need

  • $500,000 Max  for 3 years

    We dont play every Friday night , have a few daytime  games each year plus Darwin.

    Broncos forwards cant handle sun or temperatures over 16 degrees.

    Yesterday proved that

    • This reply was deleted.
      • Couldn’t agree more good Dr.

      • They’ll let Oates go and play Arthurs on that wing from the Titans I think. 

  • He's not worth $1M at the moment but by the end of five years he'll probably be worth more than that.

    • That does not mean there will be a Club out there prepared to offer this money!

      • There's always desperate clubs out there pinching stars off the big clubs by paying massive overs.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Randy Handlinger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"We are going beyond that"
6 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Nope. Wrong again sweetie. We have subpoenaed Melb documents and called his stated reason for seeking the release a "mirage", (which means a big fucking lie for the non french amongst us). This is way past contract wording already. Keep up.
Get at…"
7 minutes ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"I agree, I feel if we lose we still sort of set a precedent of we mean business but it will be hollow. If we win, then I see teams taking us seriously and I also see players from other clubs seeing us differently too.
For our future, with Ryles and…"
17 minutes ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"On top of that, he is refusing for us to talk to the other 15 clubs. We are happy to also talk to anyone else and apparently he has said no only Melbourne. So he seems to be restricting his own trade.
Also, we are not 100% stopping him from going to…"
20 minutes ago
More…