CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal

Explosive courtroom documents obtained by The Sydney Morning Herald has revealed that the Melbourne Storm asked the NRL to "apply the blow torch" to Parramatta to release Zac Lomax.

A slew of documents released in the Supreme Court revealed that during a phone call between Storm chair Matt Tripp and Eels supremo Matthew Beach on January 13, that the Eels again rejected a $200,000 release fee.

“During the telephone call, Mr Tripp referred to the possibility of punitive steps being taken by the NRL against Parramatta Eels in relation to its salary cap if Parramatta Eels did not agree to the proposal being put forward by the Melbourne Storm,” according to a document the Eels tendered to the court.

“This assertion by the Melbourne Storm was intended or had the tendency to exert pressure on the Parramatta Eels in circumstances where the NRL had never communicated such a stance to the Parramatta Eels.”

It was further revealed that an alleged text from Storm CEO Justin Rodski to NRL CEO Andrew Abdo on January 21 was used to try and have the NRL pressure the Eels into a release.

“Hi Andrew, not getting anywhere at this point, can you apply the blow torch on parramatta [sic] to get this done.

Rodski added: “Lomax staying in the NRL is obviously a win for the game.”

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/storm-asked-nrl-to-apply-the-blow-torch-to-get-lomax-transfer-done-20260213-p5o224.html

It's what we always suspected. The Storm trying to bully their way into a deal that would favour them. They should be expelled from the competition.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

    • Anal, did that msg give you the impression that this was a first time call for  Blowtorchery?

      When vlandys ran to grab it the fucking thing was still warm

       

      • Nope, you could say the same phone call was made by Penrith to delay May's suspension till the next season. Is it making sense now?

        • Yes you are right :(

          fact they felt comfortable enough to suggest this to the nrl proves alot to me too :(

          collusion and favouritism is real in their two 'seperate divisions'  in comp. Parra will always have their most resilient fans regardless...maybe others without their bucket loads of extra cash and wins might not perhaps.🤷🏻‍♀️

  • We are taking on a Cabal...we need allies in this fight and the coming revelations are how we gather them

  • Let's not forget the NRL just enacted new anti-tampering rules, effective 1 February. They're specifically designed to prohibit direct and indirect inducement when a player is not yet free to negotiate. In Lomax's case, he was feee to negotiate but only with the Eels' consent. One for the lawyers but does that mean the Eels had to give consent prior to Lomax negotiating? If that is the case, if Lomax was not free to negotiate unless the Eels had given consent, anti-tampering applies? With its sanctions including fines, salary cap penalties and deregistration. 

  • What absolute grubs the Storm are and the NRL for letting them get away with it.  Im sure all fans from other clubs are right behind Parramatta and their stance and even more so if we win the court case 

  • Nothing on Foxsport yet.

    • Reckon there'd be a bit of "keeping this all under wraps' pressure being applied Hoe ... once nrl fans hear about this they ain't gonna like it either. Though perhaps they'll be some fans and clubs that would rather stay out ie those with huge spends aspect ie Roosters, Broncos Storm  etc.

      afterall, we all know the nrl is split into two comps those that have (huge amount to spend) and those that don't. It's fact. As I've already said Im glad thst right now our club is absolutely by the book and I now see why we don't have obvious huge TPAs set up, judging by our roster vs broncos storm  or roosters.

      • Macy, it sure is a PR disaster. Crawley has been an inspired daily Foxsport voice covering this matter, and on our side. If he doesn't comment on this, we'll know why.

        • Yes he has been Hoe speaking up for what is clearly right! It's good to see journos with guts for a change. 
          looking like their guts will be made to shrink by nrl after this one.

          wonder what dirt they are hoping to dish up on us soon I'd reckon to sway narrative in media perhaps? Thank God we are obviously abiding by salary cap rules re TPAs these days...see why we are clearly from this kinda convo between a (top) club and nrl 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Poppa replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"Yes Macy, that is a very salient aspect of this discussion.
Haven't read the rest of this thread yet, but that say's so much to an observant eye!"
35 seconds ago
LB replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
""Give us Zac"
"Uhhh ok but we want *insert name*"
"No just give him to us, we are not giving you anything"
"Well you do not get Zac"
"How dare you, Peter, Peter help!!!!!"
 
But remember, to some it is a case of "Oh well that is the way it goes" How…"
3 minutes ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"On FB, they posted the story but have turned off the comments 🤣🤣🤣"
3 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"So what does exactly mean for the Storm, Lomax and Parra? Surely, these documents will favour Parra? What are the most probable consequences for the Storm and Lomax now"
11 minutes ago
More…