You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"I've never agreed with the term "swap" being used in this saga. There is no swap. Lomax isn't an employee of ours. Not sure why the nrl want to involve themselves in this, or the players association for that matter. It's an agreement between us and…"
"Best example I can think of is if a player tears an acl then the club rips up his 4 year contract 🤣 unfortunate situations happen but you've signed the damn contract "
"It's just not the right way to do things is it. I have no idea what the final outcome of this will be, as I said before likely that Lomax pays some sort of compensation and it's done - not ideal from our perspective but that's life."
"Only difference here is that JAC was actually playing so NRL had no interest in getting him back into the game.
Not sure why they're so interested in this 1 guy who is most likely going to go to R360 if/when it actually starts."
Not sure why they're so interested in this 1 guy who is most likely going to go to R360 if/when it actually starts."
Replies
This is easy. Should we change ours? No.
Likewise.
Hell NO, C'bury are only changing it so the name has little resemblance to the shithole area it is.
Never change colours / emblem etc.
Just gets better.
😂🤣😂🤣
That's more puppies. I would feel bad beating them up.
😂 😂😂😂
Hearing the dogs changing their logo I thought maybe a bulldog wearing a burka, but this is worse.
Maybe with Vegas coming up they are trying to appeal to the yanks. Failing that, what the f&@$.
Just as bad as our logo in the early 2000s, comic book stuff it was dreadful .
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next