Brandon Smith avoids suspension

The NRL simply refuse to sanction any Melbourne Storm player. Brandon Smith joins Felise Kaufusi & Nelson Afosa-Solomona on the protected species list of Storm players who have remarkably avoided suspension.
Melbourne have a few injuries & the Nrl need them firing during the finals.
This is getting truely embarrassing.

10751329096?profile=RESIZE_710x

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Did anyone really expect a different result?

    • Well I am naive BEM.......not even referred!   Their immunity remains mind-boggling!

  • That was not a hip drop. Smith did not deserve any suspension or fine.

  • I agree, it was on the lighter end, but if they want to get it out of the game they need to sanction every example. I reckon he could've been given a couple of weeks to send a message but since it's the Scumbags, nope 

  • Smith did lose control of the tackle. Him being dragged along the ground and then swinging himself into Tino isn't a defence. This is like trying to argue that you should be able to hit a bloke in the head if he steps you and you hang an arm out.

    On the scale of hipdrops, this wasn't the worst so I can understand no suspension.

    • It's not even close to a hip drop. 

    • What is he supposed to do Super, let go ?

  • I hate the Storm more than peak hour traffic but this tackle wasn't that bad. It didn't look intentional. It looked like he got swung around. 

  • Hate the Storm, love a good conspiracy story, however anyone calling for the Cheese to be sanctioned for that tackle is dreaming. Nothing in it. We have too much microscopic paralysis by analysis in the NRL, no wonder the refs don't have the cojones to make a decision and have the bunker make all the hard decisions. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Blue Eel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax signs a 2y deal with Rugby Australia
"And that's exactly what was supposed to happen when he demanded his release 6 months ago. Club was prepared to release him then with nothing in return. Status quo remains. 
The only great outcome for us is he will never line up against us."
4 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax signs a 2y deal with Rugby Australia
"The issue we have now is we struggle to close deals for high tier talent players.That was an issue for this regime before this saga.
It still doesn't take away from us stopping Melbourne basically trying to run the table on us we stopped that and…"
9 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kemp: Eels vs Storm R1 refereeing was 'Disgraceful"
"https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1D6Sb9ND1F/?mibextid=wwXIfr
Nah there just well managed there success has very little todo with what the nrl want."
15 minutes ago
Muttman replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax signs a 2y deal with Rugby Australia
"We can't complain. This is precisely what was happening when we released him. We get his cap money to use elsewhere. We don't give our competitor (who just pumped us) a rep player to compete against us.Case closed. I never want to hear about this…"
17 minutes ago
More…