Brandon Smith avoids suspension

The NRL simply refuse to sanction any Melbourne Storm player. Brandon Smith joins Felise Kaufusi & Nelson Afosa-Solomona on the protected species list of Storm players who have remarkably avoided suspension.
Melbourne have a few injuries & the Nrl need them firing during the finals.
This is getting truely embarrassing.

10751329096?profile=RESIZE_710x

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Did anyone really expect a different result?

    • Well I am naive BEM.......not even referred!   Their immunity remains mind-boggling!

  • That was not a hip drop. Smith did not deserve any suspension or fine.

  • I agree, it was on the lighter end, but if they want to get it out of the game they need to sanction every example. I reckon he could've been given a couple of weeks to send a message but since it's the Scumbags, nope 

  • Smith did lose control of the tackle. Him being dragged along the ground and then swinging himself into Tino isn't a defence. This is like trying to argue that you should be able to hit a bloke in the head if he steps you and you hang an arm out.

    On the scale of hipdrops, this wasn't the worst so I can understand no suspension.

    • It's not even close to a hip drop. 

    • What is he supposed to do Super, let go ?

  • I hate the Storm more than peak hour traffic but this tackle wasn't that bad. It didn't look intentional. It looked like he got swung around. 

  • Hate the Storm, love a good conspiracy story, however anyone calling for the Cheese to be sanctioned for that tackle is dreaming. Nothing in it. We have too much microscopic paralysis by analysis in the NRL, no wonder the refs don't have the cojones to make a decision and have the bunker make all the hard decisions. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Hell On Eels's discussion We Don’t Lose Games in Moments. We Lose Them in Minutes.
"Guess what? Every team tries to manipulate rules to their advantage. If a team is better at it than others then good on them, every team does it. Doesn't mean the sole reason they are winning. 
Can you please, please answer me this question. Is the…"
38 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion We Don’t Lose Games in Moments. We Lose Them in Minutes.
"A very good read, once again.
Some take aways for me.
i. I can now see why the NRL wanted to change the kick off rule giving the defending team the right to kick off or receive after a try against them. If the game is to stay as is. This rule is a…"
46 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Hell On Eels's discussion We Don’t Lose Games in Moments. We Lose Them in Minutes.
"Not always the penalty counts! It depends where exactly the penalty was given, the amount of set restarts and what tackle it's given on, where on the field. Like I said Penrith are experts at it and are able to manipulate the referees exactly when…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Hell On Eels's discussion We Don’t Lose Games in Moments. We Lose Them in Minutes.
"Yeah worked for the Warriors winning 10-1 penalty count.....oh wait no they lost.
Well I mean Dragons won 10-5 coun....oh they lost too.
Difference is Penrith are just that good and they had on penalty more on Friday night."
1 hour ago
More…