Barnett swap for Lomax

Now Lomax deal to Melbourne is dead, for now, there media circles swirling that Parramatta could use Lomax to try and acquire Barnett. Sending the incumbent NSW Origin Winger to New Zealand in exchange for the NSW Prop Barnet.

Is it a fair trade? On paper, definately. I am concerned on Barnett's age, but no denying the player he is and Ryles mentioned it is an area we need to strengthen. Barnett is a good start and thinking about it could be a nice bridge to bring in Talagi and Koina as Barnett would not be at the club long enough to completely block their paths.

In another note, Junior Paulo has mentioned he wants to stay at Parramatta in 2027, his management are in negotiations now. I reckon we see him extend for one more year for less money, then it will be a rolling deal depending on how he is going. If we land Barnett, it could lead Paulo to the bench using him as an impact player. 

8. Hopgood

9. Smith

10. Barnett

11. Williams

12. Kautoga

13. de Belin

14. Walker

15. Paulo

16. Doorey

17. Tuivaiti

 

That is a nice bench and middle.

https://www.news.com.au/sport/nrl/eels-mull-over-zac-lomax-player-swap-in-attempt-to-sign-state-of-origin-star/news-story/611a978307376dec6b9a3f177533f702

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • You defiently wouldnt say NO to a quality player like Barnett and with Matterson on the brink of medical retirement he'd be a great addition

  • I'd be interested to hear people's thoughts on signing a 31 year old prop coming off a full acl reconstruction in exchange for Lomax when the court case was only settled yesterday. Yeah great idea, we've just bought ourselves 2 years and blow it in the space of 24 hours.

  • In theory it makes sense and it works for us, but does it work for Lomax or the Warriors?

    I did hear that Lomax was only interested in joining the NRL because it was with The Storm, so i'm not sure his position has changed on this? He has a big decision on his plate in whether he returns to Rugby League or not in the next 2 years. R360 is highly unstable and may not be on the table anymore, he's lost a lot of money taking this gamble and he would likely want to recoup that money back ASAP.

    But he seems like a reckless soul and wants to go to the highest bidder, so i'm sure a suiter will come in mid-way through the season and kick-off a bidding war. His strategy will be first a PR exercise to get his side of the story, soften up the public response, then come back as an attractive option that is in "a much better place now".

    • Funny how Brent Read and the likes claimed only Melbourne wanted him therefore should let him go as nobody wants him.

      Maybe it was Zac that refused anyone else Brent?

    • I'm not entirely sure Lomax lost a lot of money. There's talk about a golden handshake and a signing bonus with R360. I think more will come to light over the next few weeks or months, but I think Lomax will pick and choose what he wants to do next. He is a bit weird to be honnest and money may not be the deciding factor.  

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Poppa replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Matterson - The gift that keeps on giving
"I know where you are coming from Daz, I have always seen the same attributes.
Its interesting to see that Warrington (to my understanding) did not offer a contract, surprising given the attributes you noted.
I first saw Matto playing a Reserve Grade…"
6 minutes ago
Pato replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 1 Team List v Melbourne Storm
"He's the red head touch judge that's been around for years"
9 minutes ago
LB replied to LB's discussion 1EE Modern day Eels team: Centres
"Played more back-row for us
Ben Smith played a few years at Centre where McCracken played 1 year practically "
13 minutes ago
LB replied to LB's discussion 1EE Modern day Eels team: Centres
"1998 to be exact Daz, made it NRL era.
Yeah great point that none of them were one club players."
14 minutes ago
More…