Its all about common sense really, its not rocket science or reinventing the wheel, Peter, take a look at these rugby standards on high shots.

9114412463?profile=original

Imo NRL needs to look at adopting this simple take on it, which is basic common sense.

The table above isnt perfect but with some tweeking, i believe it would be a good start.

Im not stating Rugby is the perfect model when it comes to highy shots, in fact its gone overboard with the high stuff too, but at least they are directed to concider mitigating circumstances when making a ruling which NRL is currently not doing.

Thoughts gents?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Snake, this is a great find. I've never seen it before but it makes perfect sense. It also means PVL completely tried to reinvent the wheel. Now, for shits and giggles, I thought "gee, how far would PVL have had to go to Rugby Headquarters to get this info?". I mean, PVL claims he "consults widely" and "listens". And Rugby is well-known for having cracked down on head high tackles, so it would be an obvious outreach source.

    NRL Headquarters is in the Moore Park precinct near the Cricket ground of course. Google told me the Rugby Headquarters is ... the next bloody building over!

    Seriously, he could not walk one building? Hell, he could have overhead feedback standing outside getting a coffee somewhere. 

    PVL claims to consult, to listen, to take advice, but the building over has a workable and sensible decision-tree and he either ignores it or was ignorant of it? This is what happens when a micro-managing corporate stooge with a relevancy complex makes policy because the Rorters called him in the car on the way to work.

  • Maybe I'm a bit slow but I found that tree confusing. 
    To me it's even simpler. There are 2 types of incidents to deal with. 1) Accidents. 2) Reckless/careless/foul play. 
    Accidents: Players accidentally collide, player is grassed in a tackle and falls into the shoulder of a defender etc. These seem obvious to me. At most a penalty but more likely play on. 
    Reckless/careless/foul play: Direct forceful contact with the head is a sin bin. Extreme forceful contact is a send off. Everything else is a penalty and on report. 

    • Exactly it's not hard. Surely some common sense needs to be shown when it comes to high conduct.

      Intentional and reckless always stands out and should be sin binned or sent off. Anything else report and penalty and we move on.

  • This is how long its been since I watched rugby but what does RC and YC stand for?

    PK I assume is place kick.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Your best 19 vs Storm
"But how long is he willing to give himself? If Smith is still starting by the end of 2027 and he is extended with intent to start in 2028, what will Da Silva do then?I would love to know if Ryles intent is for Da Silva to eventually be the starting…"
51 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Your best 19 vs Storm
"I saw TDS try to pressure the kicker at times last night but not as consistent or forceful as Smith.
I love your analogy of how TDS read his own hype and thinks he can just play and be amazing. Where Smith is the opposite where he has had to grind…"
53 minutes ago
TolEllts replied to Blue Eel's discussion Trial #2, Game Day Blog v Roosters: We Just Won the Pre-Season Cup
"EA, you have a keen eye for players especially those with with real potentials. Appreciate your updates on our juniors."
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Roy tannous's discussion Matto most likely gonna medically retire
"You're a good man. I salute your empathy and offer of practical help for the disabled"
1 hour ago
More…