You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Lol! Having a bet each way now."
"He is as trusted of a source as the Mole dope"
"🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣"
"The dope updated it to this"
Replies
Love how we now think of a price, we don't budge it rock solid. Let him go to Manly, let be frank Manly are heading for a melt down. Everyone knows it & the kid knows it. But he will get more money at Manly. Lol
They'll have a half back playing more then 6 games next year.
I mean is this a surprise.
Why isn't this club looking to upgrade its front office and football department staff aswell as its players has always been the question I've asked for years now.How accountable are the CEO GM of football R and R members are they held to the same accountability as the HC?
Some of these people have been in positions of power for more than 5 years but here we are why are they not held to account for lack of results.They are all pieces in the puzzle but here we are another missed opportunity to add a player and they've come up short and in a rebuilding phase with $$$$$ to burn yet can't get the job done.When does the mentioned accountability kick in or is it just business as usual and move onto the next failure.
I also ask is JR not a pull either as he's clearly spoken to players that we've tried to attract and retain I mean if Bennett were here does he get these deals over the line conjecture yes but like Gus I bet he does.
Only thing I will say is yes Bennett would get players despite the board but that is due to a proven record. Ryles of course doesn't have that so you can like Ryles but not enough runs on the board.
Something going on with manly and tigers they've basically swapped players the last few years 😂 I don't really see much changing for manly unless they buy some middles.
Their middles are ageing. They are heading for a rebuild as the Trbojevic brothers and DCE move on and have money. Difference is they will buy most of the players they want.
MON? Would say "Do you accept bits of string?" As a low ball tactic.
650k a year for a backup hooker who cant tackle. With purchases like these manly are heading for the bottom of the table. What ridiculous money for an untired player. We need a hooker that can transition to lock. That would be ideal.
They are definitely paying on potential but their forward stocks are a far bigger issue then the 9 spot. Desperation signing for manly
You really think we would sign him to be a back-up Darren? We weren't signing him with the intent of being a back-up. If we were happy with Smith moving forward we weren't signing him.
We need a Hooker that can play eyes up it seems according to Ryles.
Fuck being favours twice we were twice we miss out on a tiger
We are starting to be a joke as someone said we only get 35 years old players who no one wants
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
of 12 Next