Allgood's Sinbinning

I was never really one who bought into the referees treating us so much differently but after seeing Allgood and Matai last night Im starting to wonder. Matai ran a good 20m to get up in Allgoods face and Allgood reacted. Not condoning fighting but its a physical sport and these things happen, as anyone whos played football can tell you. My major problem isn't that they have changed the rules is that once again, only OUR player gets sin binned. I thought the rule was anyone who throws a punch goes to the bin???? Are you telling me no manly player threw a punch?? I cant blame Allgood for having a go though as twice this season one of our players has been hit after a penalty's called and the refs say they cant reverse the decision, so after the whistle blew last night I think he thought what have I got to lose?

It didn't have any impact on who won but I do think the eels dropped their head after that and let through 2 tries in 5 minutes. Unfortunatley Allgood will probably get  3 - 4 weeks when other people like macguire and gallen get nothing or just 1 week.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • AllGood just got in before the judiciary. McGuire hit him in an almost identical way earlier in the season and got nothing. So I guess Mitch decided he'd get in first this time.

  • if allgood gets anything more than a week (a la mcgure) then parra have to take this to the top of the nrl cause its a joke!

    there is no fkn consistency or fairness meated out to the eels and i bet he gets heaps more time than those mentioned by mack! Im with ricky its bullsht!

  • Seeing as the swinging arm caused no harm to the Manly player it should have been play-on, just because there's intent doesn't mean it's a penalty if it misses then it doesn't matter, that's basically what Billy Harrigan said on another related incident with swinging arms. Allgood should have been sin-binned but so should have Matai, Allgood wouldn't have started throwing punches if Matai wasn't there so really Matai should have gotten more for being the third man in and exacerbating the situation.

    • ham - i would take it further to say that he was actually swinging for the ball as it actually popped out of beuhrers hands! the video is not conclusive that it was an attack on the man and in addition the referee was standing less than 2 metres from the incident, watched it, and didnt call any foul..... 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Adam Magrath replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"I've got a feeling De Belin will be starting prop and junior will come off the bench. I'm not sure how everything else fits together but that's what my gut is telling me."
4 minutes ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"Simonsson is significantly better than Kelly. But Simonsson is a winger. Don't understand the Bailey disrespect on this site"
25 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"please don' call it a safe space.  Don't get snowflake hopes up. "
45 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"I think Bailey is the closest like for like replacement to Lomax. His work out of the backfield is strong and he's a much better finisher then Sean. What may happen is Ryles gives Russell the Dylan brown treatment and he's the 18th man most weeks ?…"
48 minutes ago
More…