All out attack mentality

BA on his media rounds tonight has said he takes full responsibility for the loss . We've built our season on defence and we went into the Souths game with an all out attack mentality which confused the players. 

We're going to go back to our style and would much rather win a game 14-10 than lose 38-0.

Can't make this shit up.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • And?

    btw he never said the players were confused. 

    • What did he say then?

      The all our attack mentality produced 0 points. and seriously, what first grade footballer works on their attack during the week so shows up and throws out the last 15 weeks worth of defensive principles.

      He doesn't know what happened, its a lame excuse. He didnt get the team up, they've looked tired for 6 weeks and the defensive systems the coaching staff built were flattered by wet and slippery tracks and teams with key players out. Waqa and Fergo have had the same issues all year which haven't been corrected but werent as exposed with teams staying away from the sidelines. Sivo has lost all defensive confidence. This result has been building for weeks and if he thinks it comes down to the team incorrectly going into the game with an 'all out attack' mentality twhich produced ZERO points then hes kidding himself.

      • What did you honestly want to hear? He took full responsibility and simply said he probably focused too much on attack during the week instead of their usual defensive mindset. Sounds reasonable to me. 
        What would have left you satisfied? (Apart from him saying he's quitting). 

        • We worked on our attack all week, went into the game with an attacking mentality and we scored ZERO points. Where does that fill you with confidence the guy knows what he's talking about?

          • Pretend you're BA. Tell us what he should have said that would have made you satisfied. 

            • Check the end of this thread I answered what I felt wouldve been better there :)

  • This reply was deleted.
    • This reply was deleted.
      • Lol popps you're too smart to be on this site. You just confused the numb nuts

  • This reply was deleted.
    • This reply was deleted.
      • Tough question that BA nor his supporters can answer I'm afraid.

  • We need to own our effort areas.  He ne or saw this coming but everyone else did 

    Honestly ba has lost me.  Its obvious we take high risks in our own half.

    How many times have we turned over possession in our own 50 in the past 6 weeks, must be the worst in the comp on that stat , but good old ba didn't see in coming 

    • This reply was deleted.
      • SACK THE USELESS *#@* AND HIRE A REAL COACH!

        The guy has NFI and proved the old adage, "It is better to be thought a fool than open your mouth and prove them right."

        Same ole platitudes we hear every week - Ah well Popps I see you haven't forgotten the good old days.

        kearney bandwagon - Photos - 1Eyed Eel

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

SuperEel 22 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"How are Melbourne in the box seat exactly? The Eels have all the leverage. They have the Lomax contract, the Storm need to provide a player to have him released from that contract, and it has to be a player the Eels agree to accepting.
The Eels can…"
55 seconds ago
CarloEEL2 replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"I think it's great for our standing 
we are never a club to be HEARD or matter 
this gets out name and voice out there with some authority and media coverage 
thanks Lomax !!!!"
5 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"I think something has to give. Lomax could mean the difference between making the finals and winning it fir them.    Howarth isn't anywhere near his class and could be the one.
Coats i can't see wanting out.
And Utoikamanu is long odds, they won't…"
7 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"I want a pony"
7 minutes ago
More…