All out attack mentality

BA on his media rounds tonight has said he takes full responsibility for the loss . We've built our season on defence and we went into the Souths game with an all out attack mentality which confused the players. 

We're going to go back to our style and would much rather win a game 14-10 than lose 38-0.

Can't make this shit up.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • And?

    btw he never said the players were confused. 

    • What did he say then?

      The all our attack mentality produced 0 points. and seriously, what first grade footballer works on their attack during the week so shows up and throws out the last 15 weeks worth of defensive principles.

      He doesn't know what happened, its a lame excuse. He didnt get the team up, they've looked tired for 6 weeks and the defensive systems the coaching staff built were flattered by wet and slippery tracks and teams with key players out. Waqa and Fergo have had the same issues all year which haven't been corrected but werent as exposed with teams staying away from the sidelines. Sivo has lost all defensive confidence. This result has been building for weeks and if he thinks it comes down to the team incorrectly going into the game with an 'all out attack' mentality twhich produced ZERO points then hes kidding himself.

      • What did you honestly want to hear? He took full responsibility and simply said he probably focused too much on attack during the week instead of their usual defensive mindset. Sounds reasonable to me. 
        What would have left you satisfied? (Apart from him saying he's quitting). 

        • We worked on our attack all week, went into the game with an attacking mentality and we scored ZERO points. Where does that fill you with confidence the guy knows what he's talking about?

          • Pretend you're BA. Tell us what he should have said that would have made you satisfied. 

            • Check the end of this thread I answered what I felt wouldve been better there :)

  • This reply was deleted.
    • This reply was deleted.
      • Lol popps you're too smart to be on this site. You just confused the numb nuts

  • This reply was deleted.
    • This reply was deleted.
      • Tough question that BA nor his supporters can answer I'm afraid.

  • We need to own our effort areas.  He ne or saw this coming but everyone else did 

    Honestly ba has lost me.  Its obvious we take high risks in our own half.

    How many times have we turned over possession in our own 50 in the past 6 weeks, must be the worst in the comp on that stat , but good old ba didn't see in coming 

    • This reply was deleted.
      • SACK THE USELESS *#@* AND HIRE A REAL COACH!

        The guy has NFI and proved the old adage, "It is better to be thought a fool than open your mouth and prove them right."

        Same ole platitudes we hear every week - Ah well Popps I see you haven't forgotten the good old days.

        kearney bandwagon - Photos - 1Eyed Eel

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"It was he could not sign any Melbourne players for 2025. Yet mid 2025 it could be Storm tried poaching Lomax."
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"yawn.  you see what suits you.. We will see
We can win in court and still get strong-armed by Vlandys to play nice, just not with Melb"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"LB, I am assuming that the Ryles distancing himself from Melb is for a season, not a year, technically he is past a year from him leaving Storm anyway. Also contact has already been established via are us contracting a Storm player already."
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Do you understand what step in and mediate means Randolph.
I agree with Anasta the NRL doesn't need to be involved, we assume those statements were made before the court case and Parramatta's statement.
The smartness of Parra's move is so the Storm…"
1 hour ago
More…