Rito boys and girls it's time to discuss again about the six man bench with player welfare top priority extra players on the bench can keep border line concussions and other injuries off .
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"I didn't expect this blog to attract such a vigorous debate. But I like it. Although, I'm not in the poo-bomb club and will be giving the Ryles Era a chance, I think the debate has been pretty civil. Kudos everyone. "
"We tried to get staggs years ago and we didn't want offer an extra year. Because that idiot MON, go figure we at the same place as we were a couple of years ago and he still not budging on big signings. Call me an arrogant prick we aren't going…"
"
It's a flawed comparison it is indeed. Blowouts (20+) have never been higher than right now. They've doubled since unlimited tackles and increased dramatically since the Restart Era. Keep increasing year on year.
This is the first year the…"
It's a flawed comparison it is indeed. Blowouts (20+) have never been higher than right now. They've doubled since unlimited tackles and increased dramatically since the Restart Era. Keep increasing year on year.
This is the first year the…"
"Pezet and samrani back in the team. Be interesting to see if they make the starting 17"
Replies
Reduce the interchange even further - the benefits of fatigue in players will reduce the wrestle, reduce 3 and 4 man tackles, open the game up with attrition and fatigue, allowing the small skillful player, the ball runners the heads up footballers to come into their own later in the game. A much better, free flowing game that capitalises on instinct with fatigue in defensive lines. Ohhhhhhhhh I reminisce, how i hate the amount of rigid structure in todays game and the amount of illegal plays to slow the attacking play down that only results in a quick 6 again call.
Nah reduce the interchange and watch our game entertain once again.