6 man bench

What's everyone's thoughts on a six man bench.with the game getting faster and the growing amount of hia's and injuries would it benefit the competition.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Remember 2000 when the comp started early cause of the Olympics for the 1st 6 weeks clubs were allowed to have 2 extra Subs on the bench.

    The 2 subs were permanent the player they replaced wasn't allowed back on.

    I'd bring that back but with a 3 interchange players and 6 changes. Then 2 permanent reserves this would add a tactical aspect to the bench and team structure plus players like Stone and Perham whould then have a defined role within a team like ours

    • I'd rather have a system similar to soccer where you could have say, 7 men on the bench, but you can only use 4 of them. That way you can carry back up playmakers and outside backs without weakening your middle forward rotation 

      • They can't come back on the field once they come off aswell is that correct 

        • In soccer that is the case, but I'd still have limited interchange in RL, but maybe limited to one interchange per player, second time a player is interchanged he's off permanently. 

    • Thats an interesting one

  • Maybe have 6 subs on the bench but can only use 4 of those subs during the game. So if a spine or outside back gets injured early in the game, they can easily be replaced with someone who plays that position. If no injuries, can use the normal rotation they like 

    • I dont mind that

  • I like it but with only 4 being allowed to be used.

    You could have 4 forwards,  a utility and an outside back on your bench and decide during the game which 4 you use depending on situations and injuries during games.

    Edit. Sorry EA just seen your exact same reply above mine.

    • Only Muttman and I manage to post the exact same thought at exactly the same time as each other 😂

      • Funny. Me and muttman have too in the past, some kind of weird mental triangle thing going on here.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

KENDOZA replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"Agreed coryn. People don't realise the roosters went hard for him but chose parra"
43 minutes ago
KENDOZA replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"1.longi 2.kelly 3.penisini 4.howarth 5. Fox 6.pezet 7.moses 8. Hopegood 9.smith 10.debelin 11.kit kat 12.williams 13.junior 14.desilva 15.walker 16.tuilagi 17.tuivati."
44 minutes ago
Darren Munro replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"Worse comes to worse parramatta takes him back and make him honour his contract. Screw Melbourne.  I would take coates or no one. They don't get to choose. Even if lomax wins in court. The nrl are within there rights to not registered his…"
50 minutes ago
KingGutho replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"1: I Longi
2: B Simonson 
3: W Penisini
4: B Kelly
5: J Addo Carr
6: J Pezet
7: M Moses ( c ) ( gk )
8: Jr Paulo 
9: R Smith 
10: J Hopgood 
11: K Tuilugi
12: K Kautoga 
13: JDB
 
14: T Silva
15: J Williams ( edge, middle )
16: S Tuivita 
17: D…"
1 hour ago
More…