6 man bench

What's everyone's thoughts on a six man bench.with the game getting faster and the growing amount of hia's and injuries would it benefit the competition.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Remember 2000 when the comp started early cause of the Olympics for the 1st 6 weeks clubs were allowed to have 2 extra Subs on the bench.

    The 2 subs were permanent the player they replaced wasn't allowed back on.

    I'd bring that back but with a 3 interchange players and 6 changes. Then 2 permanent reserves this would add a tactical aspect to the bench and team structure plus players like Stone and Perham whould then have a defined role within a team like ours

    • I'd rather have a system similar to soccer where you could have say, 7 men on the bench, but you can only use 4 of them. That way you can carry back up playmakers and outside backs without weakening your middle forward rotation 

      • They can't come back on the field once they come off aswell is that correct 

        • In soccer that is the case, but I'd still have limited interchange in RL, but maybe limited to one interchange per player, second time a player is interchanged he's off permanently. 

    • Thats an interesting one

  • Maybe have 6 subs on the bench but can only use 4 of those subs during the game. So if a spine or outside back gets injured early in the game, they can easily be replaced with someone who plays that position. If no injuries, can use the normal rotation they like 

    • I dont mind that

  • I like it but with only 4 being allowed to be used.

    You could have 4 forwards,  a utility and an outside back on your bench and decide during the game which 4 you use depending on situations and injuries during games.

    Edit. Sorry EA just seen your exact same reply above mine.

    • Only Muttman and I manage to post the exact same thought at exactly the same time as each other 😂

      • Funny. Me and muttman have too in the past, some kind of weird mental triangle thing going on here.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Picking Up Where We Left Off?
"Poppa, I know the chance of dementia plays on your mind. Here's a rabbit hole for you. A way to stave off the diagnosis of dementia. It's the first I have heard of it. This link  should start at the right spot (13min), don't worry about the title…"
57 minutes ago
Archie replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"Vlandy's is a dick, a tiny dick, but a dick nevertheless. He is now showing himself and the NRL to be corrupt, who knows what he owes the Storm and Mr Tripp.
The legal eagles will not buy the babbling idiots bullshit."
1 hour ago
Yehez replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Ryles 2.0: 2026 gets off to a bright start in Eels trial
"Tago will be NSW cup fodder. I think if we take JAC-Kelly-Will-Simmo as our start 2-5, our backup would be Russell, Richie, Samrani and even Twidle before we pick Tago. And according to MON we are still looking to sign an outside back. So Tago might…"
1 hour ago
Yehez replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Ryles 2.0: 2026 gets off to a bright start in Eels trial
"I said in another blog that middle defence in our red zone remains my main worry. So we'll see.
But overall I am optimistic. I like how many players seem to be playing well and adapting to different roles.
I see possible significant contribution…"
1 hour ago
More…