5 minutes in the bin

With the late trend of sides taking the two I've noticed that there are many teams including parra giving away deliberate penalties to allow their team to catch breath or hope the opposition will take the two. (Rugby Union style)

This annoys me because after a good line break there is inevitably going to be a penalty given for laying on the tackled player too long.

This takes away a sides advantage from the line break and a penalty is not sufficient because it allows the defencive team to set their line.

The NRL has to introduce 5 minutes in the bin. This way the penalty is given and the team has an advantage because there is at least two attacking sets where they will have an extra player.

Is there another fair way to discourage these professional fouls?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • On this anyone see Foran screaming at Guntherson to get off the Tigers players late in the game when he conceded a penalty. Foran is all class.
  • I thought he was screaming enthusiastically for their combined effort in getting back to stop the try.

    Realistically, that is an example that would attract 5 minutes in the bin. The tigers did a lot of good work to get us on the back foot and we deliberately slowed them down to set our line.

    If it happened in the game I would have spewed at the ref but I think it would have been fair from an unbiased perspective.

    It is a professional foul.

  • I think it's obvious why there is reluctance to use 5 mins in the bin to punish slowing of the play the ball. You have to judge intent, but your only evidence for intent is behavioral action not access to the mind, and the ref would be in a confirmation bias situation if instructed to use the bin for an offense occurring in your own quarter. So a similar offense 30m upfield is just an ordinary penalty? You impute intent when fatigue or the desire to roll off in a way that leaves you square at marker (because the line is close) equally suffice as explanation? My point is the ref would be in no-mans land decision-wise: stuck between arbitrary and confirmation bias. Fans would freak out, making all the same points.

    Bennett is probably right about deliberate tactics. The issue is whether the cure would be worse than the disease?
  • I'm not sure if I like what I've seen of Greenburg.

    He seems to have a view that the game is entertainment only and has no concern for the sport itself.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Die hard eels Supporter replied to LB's discussion Parramatta announce signing of English International
"Fucking Eels management, they probably don't even realise that they don't have any backup wingers and barely any centres"
7 minutes ago
Die hard eels Supporter replied to LB's discussion Parramatta announce signing of English International
"🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣"
8 minutes ago
LB posted a discussion
Parramatta Eels are pleased to announce the signing of International English forward who has played for such clubs as Wigan Warriors, Widnes Vikings and just recently HMP Wandsworth. Second-rower Gareth Hock has finally had his visa accepted,…
30 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Matterson’s back @ training today. What now.
"Yeah it is getting concerning. More so to the fact that Garrick now linked to Roosters and Taulagi to Dragons. Dragons have a chance of getting a player. Koloamatangi we go hard for and seem to miss out again. We are turning into the Dragons where…"
50 minutes ago
More…